Abstract
Overview Advances in high-throughput sequencing, genotyping, and characterization of haplotype diversity are consistently generating vast amounts of genomic data. Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) are the most common type of genetic variation. In the recent years the number of known SNPs has been increasing exponentially; the last release of the NCBI’s dbSNP database contained more than 50 million human SNPs. SNPs are interesting as both markers of evolutionary history and in the context of their phenotypic manifestations (e.g. characteristic traits and diseases). For some diseases, e.g. sickle-cell anemia, the causative SNPs are well documented. In most other cases, the detection of disease-causing variants is still a problem. The genome-wide association studies (GWAS) provide insight into SNP-disease relationships. However, GWAS analysis is both experimentally and computationally expensive and fails to properly consider the rare variants, i.e. individual-specific SNPs that have yet to be documented on a population scale. This discrepancy between the deluge of SNP data and the lack of its interpretation spurs the development of the SNP impact annotation/prediction algorithms. In the near future, the study of genetic variation in disease and treatment options will be key for the development of the field of personalized medicine. In 2010, the first edition of the Critical Assessment of Genomic Interpretation (CAGI; Berkeley, California) was organized to evaluate the ability of available computational methods to predict the phenotypic impacts of genomic variation. Annotation of SNPs was also a hot topic in many other meetings, such as AIMM at ECCB 2010 (Ghent, Belgium), the HGVS 2010 meeting (Washington, DC) and PSB 2011 (Big Island of Hawaii, USA). In line with the increasing interest in the genetic variation analysis and annotation, on July 15, 2011 we organized the first SNP Special Interesting Group (SNP-SIG) meeting at ISMB/ECCB’2011 in Vienna, Austria (http://snps.uib.es/ snp-sig/2011). This meeting attempted to summarize the field’s research advances in the directions of “Annotation and prediction of structural/functional impacts of coding SNPs” and “SNPs and Personal Genomics: GWAS, populations and phylogenetic analysis”. Over 70 scientists actively working in the field and strongly interested in its development have officially registered for the SIG. On the date of the meeting, an even larger number of ISMB participants have gathered to discuss their work, the state of the art, and future perspectives. In all, 17 presentation proposals and 13 posters were submitted to the SIG and eight works where selected for an oral presentation at the meeting. Distinguished scientists were invited to share their visions of the field past, present, and future: Steven Brenner (University of California at Berkeley), Atul Butte (Stanford University), John Moult (University of Maryland, College Park), Burkhard Rost (Techinal University of Munich) and Mauno Vihinen (Lund University). A round table discussion on the most timely and important problems of SNP annotation was held, directed by Christopher Baker (University of New Brunswick), Maricel Kann (University of Maryland, Baltimore), Sean Mooney (Buck Institute), Pauline Ng (Genome Institute of Singapore) and Mauno Vihinen (Lund University). * Correspondence: YanaB@rci.rutgers.edu; emidio.capriotti@uab.es Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick 76 Lipman Drive, NJ 08901, USA Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Balearic Islands, Ctra. de Valldemossa Km 7.5, Palma de Mallorca, 07122 Spain Full list of author information is available at the end of the article Bromberg and Capriotti BMC Genomics 2012, 13(Suppl 4):S1 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/13/S4/S1
Highlights
Open AccessSingle Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs)-SIG Meeting 2011: Identification and annotation of SNPs in the context of structure, function, and diseaseYana Bromberg1*, Emidio Capriotti2*From SNP Special Interesting Group (SNP-SIG) 2011: Identification and annotation of SNPs in the context of structure, function and disease Vienna, Austria. 15 July 2011Overview Advances in high-throughput sequencing, genotyping, and characterization of haplotype diversity are consistently generating vast amounts of genomic data
SNPs are interesting as both markers of evolutionary history and in the context of their phenotypic manifestations
genome-wide association studies (GWAS) analysis is both experimentally and computationally expensive and fails to properly consider the rare variants, i.e. individual-specific SNPs that have yet to be documented on a population scale
Summary
Open AccessSNP-SIG Meeting 2011: Identification and annotation of SNPs in the context of structure, function, and diseaseYana Bromberg1*, Emidio Capriotti2*From SNP-SIG 2011: Identification and annotation of SNPs in the context of structure, function and disease Vienna, Austria. 15 July 2011Overview Advances in high-throughput sequencing, genotyping, and characterization of haplotype diversity are consistently generating vast amounts of genomic data. The study of genetic variation in disease and treatment options will be key for the development of the field of personalized medicine. De Valldemossa Km 7.5, Palma de Mallorca, 07122 Spain Full list of author information is available at the end of the article methods to predict the phenotypic impacts of genomic variation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.