Abstract
The gamete competition model is a likelihood version of the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) that is inspired by conditional logistic regression and the Bradley–Terry ranking procedure. In family‐based association studies, both the TDT and the gamete competition model apply directly to data on a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). Because any given SNP has limited polymorphism, it is tempting to collect several SNPs within a gene into a single super marker whose alleles are haplotypes. Unfortunately, this tactic wreaks havoc with the traditional TDT, which requires codominant markers (Spielman et al. 1993; Terwilliger & Ott, 1992). Eliminating phase ambiguities by assigning haplotypes to individuals before conducting the TDT may give misleading results because only the most probable haplotypes are then considered. Because pedigree implementations of the gamete competition model can accommodate dominant as well as codominant markers, they circumvent the phase problem by including all possible phases weighted by their estimated frequencies.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
