Abstract

This review explores the various micro-struggles at the heart of the biopolitics of the ‘war on terror’. Through a discussion of the ethico-political and aesthetic dimensions of Steve McQueen’s Hunger and Kathryn Bigelow’s The Hurt Locker, it critically evaluates questions of humanity, solidarity and conviviality under the most extreme and Manichean situations of occupation and colonialism. The article focuses on how contemporary strategies and techniques of power intersect and oscillate between biopower and sovereignty. It argues that the body remains a central site for violence and protest, while sites of exception — such as Guantanamo Bay — clearly symbolise not only the boundaryless and limitless reach of this war, but also the nexus of identity, security and law that binds life in the ‘war on terror’. An appraisal of these two very different films thus opens up new ways of interrogating the technologies at work in our post-9/11 landscape.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.