Abstract
All of Mary Stewart’s novels are rich in reference to other texts: most possess titles and epigraphs taken from a range of literary sources, and many of their plots are influenced by other works. Stewart, famous for her bestselling romantic thrillers, describes feeling that she needed to prove her worth—that she was required to demonstrate a particular level of literary awareness in order to earn her title as a particular kind of writer. However, Stewart associates her literary allusions with pleasure, something which, as the author discusses, undermines their literary value as it is calculated by the highbrow. This mixed attitude towards literary value is characteristic of Stewart’s work: the author argues that a complex negotiation of cultural capital and canonicity can be read throughout her oeuvre. With a focus on This Rough Magic (1964), this article shows that Stewart’s writing works to undermine the notion of the canon and redefine traditional notions of literary value, as well as reflect on the challenges faced by women writers. By comparing reviews of Stewart’s work with those of her male contemporary Ian Fleming, the author demonstrates how notions of gender and literary value affected the way Stewart and her novels were received and perceived.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.