Abstract
Over the past 12 years, 31 states have implemented a wide variety of policies to curb methamphetamine production in small toxic labs. This qualitative study explores the perceived impact of methamphetamine precursor laws in five states. Researchers conducted individual and focus group interviews with 77 key state policy makers and law enforcement personnel. Themes included barriers to development, perceived effectiveness and impact, effective provisions, and unintended consequences. Researchers suggest policy recommendations in light of renewed calls by policy makers and law enforcement personnel to address the recent rapid rise in small toxic lab seizures.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
