Abstract

The double-drift illusion produces a large deviation in perceived direction that strongly dissociates physical position from perceived position. Surprisingly, saccades do not seem to be affected by the illusion (Lisi & Cavanagh, 2015). When targeting a double-drift stimulus, the saccade system is driven by retinal rather than perceived position. Here, using paired double-drift targets, we test whether the smooth pursuit system is driven by perceived or physical position. Participants (n = 7) smoothly pursued the inferred midpoint (Steinbach, 1976) between two horizontally aligned Gabor patches that were separated by 20° and moving on parallel, oblique paths. On the first half of each trial, the Gabors’ internal textures were static while both drifted obliquely downward. On the second half of each trial, while the envelope moved obliquely upward, the internal texture drifted orthogonally to the envelope's motion, producing a large perceived deviation from the downward path even though the upward and downward trajectories always followed the same physical path but in opposite directions. We find that smooth pursuit eye movements accurately followed the nonillusory downward path of the midpoint between the two Gabors, but then followed the illusory rather than the physical trajectory on the upward return. Thus, virtual targets for smooth pursuit are derived from perceived rather than retinal coordinates.

Highlights

  • Motion-induced position shifts are a class of illusion where the presence of motion causes the misperception of position (Cavanagh & Anstis, 2013; Duncker, 1929; Eagleman & Sejnowski, 2007; Wallach et al, 1978; Whitney, 2002)

  • We tested the difference between the angles of the first and second segments as a measure of the influence of the illusion on smooth pursuit

  • We show that the target for smooth pursuit of the midpoint between two double-drift stimuli is derived from their perceived, not retinal, positions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Motion-induced position shifts are a class of illusion where the presence of motion causes the misperception of position (Cavanagh & Anstis, 2013; Duncker, 1929; Eagleman & Sejnowski, 2007; Wallach et al, 1978; Whitney, 2002) These illusions have been used to investigate ways in which different sources of low-level stimulus information are combined in the visual system before the formation of a conscious representation. The double-drift stimulus contains two sources of motion information: an envelope that translates across the screen (i.e., the external drift) and a moving visual texture that is confined within the envelope (i.e., the internal drift) When these two sources of motion are oriented orthogonally, the visual system combines them to produce an intermediate motion percept.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.