Abstract
Auditory motion perception remains poorly understood, in contrast with its well-established visual counterpart. Visual smooth pursuit (SP), a velocity-specific behavior, has been well-quantified during both head-fixed (ocular SP) and head-free (eye + head, or gaze SP) conditions. In contrast, auditory SP tracking has received little attention, despite its potential for demonstrating a motion-specific process in audition. We presented constant-velocity (10–40°/s), free-field auditory (0.2–20 kHz white noise), and visual (LED) targets to head-fixed or head-free subjects while recording ocular and gaze SP responses, respectively. To control for possible SP in the absence of a target, subjects were asked to recreate auditory trajectories after priming with a set of auditory ramps (practiced SP). We found that ocular auditory SP is consistently higher in gain than practiced SP, but variable and lower than visual SP. Further, the gain of auditory gaze SP exceeds ocular auditory SP. Finally, SP of periodic (triangular) motion trajectories revealed that auditory, like visual, SP improves rapidly over time, indicating predictive behavior. In sum, auditory SP closely mimics visual SP but with reduced gain. We propose that auditory motion processing exists, is robust, and recruits a velocity-dependent neural process shared with vision.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.