Abstract
Humanity's demand for ecological resources and services exceeds what earth can regenerate in that year, creating an urgent need for more sustainable behavior. Here, the focus is on a particular factor that so far has been overlooked in facilitating sustainable behavior, namely smell. The two-fold aim of this study was (i) to investigate whether ambient scent could enhance customers' subjective experience and spending behavior in a sustainable environment, and (ii) to elucidate the affective and cognitive pathways from scent to spending. To test this, a double-blind field experiment was designed where customers of a second-hand clothing store (N = 57) could face one of three conditions: fresh linen scent (pleasant and semantically priming “clean clothing” increasing the products' value), vanilla sandalwood scent (pleasant control odor), or regular store odor (odorless control). Buttressed by prior research, the fresh linen scent was expected to cause the strongest increase in spending behavior due to its positive semantic association with the product (i.e., clean clothing). The results indeed showed that fresh linen scent almost doubled consumer spending vs. the odorless control and the pleasant control odor. Other factors potentially affecting consumer behavior (e.g., weekday, weather, odor awareness) were uncorrelated. Whereas a conceptually-driven mediation analysis showed that only fresh linen scent increased mood and evaluations of the store, staff, and products, these variables did not mediate the relation between scent and spending. An explorative structural equation model suggested cognitive priming to be mainly responsible for increasing consumers' spending in the fresh linen condition by enhancing the general store evaluation. Further support is needed to corroborate the indirect findings that specific scents can follow a “cold” semantic road and a “hot” affective road to spending. At minimum, consumers are no “zombies” that empty their pockets in the presence of whatever odor; the smell needs to have a meaningful link to the (sustainable) context at hand to influence consumer behavior.
Highlights
Earth Overshoot Day (EOD) refers to the date on which humans’ demand for ecological resources and services has exceeded what planet earth can regenerate in that year (Earth Overshoot Day, 2021)
The first hypothesis entailed that exposure to a fresh linen scent would cause people to spend more money in a secondhand clothing store compared to no odor and control odor exposure
Mediation analysis showed that only a fresh linen scent could increase mood and evaluations of the store; yet, these variables did not mediate the significant link between fresh linen odor and spending
Summary
Earth Overshoot Day (EOD) refers to the date on which humans’ demand for ecological resources and services has exceeded what planet earth can regenerate in that year (Earth Overshoot Day, 2021). Synthetic clothing is especially problematic taking 20–200 years to fully decompose, releasing harmful greenhouse gasses like methane in the process which fuels global warming further (McCarthy, 2018). To overcome these problems and prevent irreversible damage to the environment or loss of function in natural systems, sustainable consumption is needed
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.