Smartphone-Based Pelvic Movement Asymmetry Measures for Clinical Decision Making in Equine Lameness Assessment.

Eva Marunova,Thilo Pfau,Stefan Witte,Leea Dod

doi:10.3390/ani11061665

Eva Marunova, Thilo Pfau + Show 2 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061665

Copy DOI

Abstract

Simple SummaryAs visual evaluation of hindlimb lameness in the horse is challenging, objective measurements could aid clinical decision making. Our study investigated the association of pelvic movement asymmetry, recorded via a smartphone, with lameness scores of one experienced veterinarian. In general, cut-off points between lameness grades increased with increasing severity of lameness. Pelvic upward movement amplitude difference was the asymmetry parameter with the highest discriminative power based on subjective lameness scoring of a specialist veterinarian. This parameter classified a higher proportion of lame and non-lame horses correctly compared to the parameters assessing differences between pelvic vertical movement minima and maxima. Although the use of a smartphone measuring only the symmetry of pelvis cannot replace a full lameness examination, it presents a useful adjunct to subjective evaluation alone. Quantification of pelvic asymmetry with a smartphone may also be a useful tool in the context of tracking progress after a treatment or during the rehabilitation process.Visual evaluation of hindlimb lameness in the horse is challenging. Objective measurements, simultaneous to visual assessment, are used increasingly to aid clinical decision making. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of pelvic movement asymmetry with lameness scores (UK scale 0–10) of one experienced veterinarian. Absolute values of pelvic asymmetry measures, quantifying differences between vertical minima (AbPDMin), maxima (AbPDMax) and upward movement amplitudes (AbPDUp), were recorded during straight-line trot with a smartphone attached to the sacrum (n = 301 horses). Overall, there was a significant difference between lameness grades for all three asymmetry measures (p < 0.001). Five pair-wise differences (out of 10) were significant for AbPDMin (p 0.02) and seven for AbPDMax (p 0.03) and AbPDUp (p 0.02). Receiver operating curves assessed sensitivity and specificity of asymmetry measures against lameness scores. AbPDUp had the highest discriminative power (area under curve (AUC) = 0.801–0.852) followed by AbPDMax (AUC = 0.728–0.813) and AbPDMin (AUC = 0.688–0.785). Cut-off points between non-lame (grade 0) and lame horses (grades 1–4) with a minimum sensitivity of 75% were identified as AbPDUp 7.5 mm (67.6% specificity), AbPDMax 4.5 mm (51.9% specificity) and AbPDMin 2.5 mm (33.3% specificity). In conclusion, pelvic upward movement amplitude difference (AbPDUp) was the asymmetry parameter with the highest discriminative power in this study.

Highlights

Introduction distributed under the terms andAssessment and grading of equine lameness can be a challenge for veterinarians since they rely on subjective visual recognition of changes in movement
Not all horses included in the study were presented for lamene tigation, the study population consisted of horses visually categorised as n as well as lame
This study investigated the clinical application of three pelvic movement symmetry parameters which can, for example, be calculated from a smartphone attached over the sacrum of a horse

Summary

Introduction

Introduction distributed under the terms andAssessment and grading of equine lameness can be a challenge for veterinarians since they rely on subjective visual recognition of changes in movement. Been increasingly incorporated into lameness evaluations [2,3] While these systems offer a high degree of accuracy and repeatability between trials [4], the equipment cost may be prohibitive for a wider use, for example to regularly monitor movement symmetry. Asymmetry measures obtained via a smartphone might be a useful adjunct to the lameness evaluation when more sophisticated equipment is not available. This might be useful for assessing hindlimb movement asymmetries as hindlimb lameness tends to be more difficult to assess visually than forelimb lameness [6]

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion