Abstract

Topology optimization (TO) of engineering products is an important design task to maximize performance and efficiency, which can be divided into two main categories of gradient-based and non-gradient-based methods. In recent years, significant attention has been brought to the non-gradient-based methods, mainly because they do not demand access to the derivatives of the objective functions. This property makes them well compatible to the structure of knowledge in the digital design and simulation domains, particularly in Computer Aided Design and Engineering (CAD/CAE) environments. These methods allow for the generation and evaluation of new evolutionary solutions without using the sensitivity information. In this work, a new non-gradient TO methodology using a variation of Simulated Annealing (SA) is presented. This methodology adaptively adjusts newly-generated candidates based on the history of the current solutions and uses the crystallization heuristic to smartly control the convergence of the TO problem. If the changes in the previous solutions of an element and its neighborhood improve the results, the crystallization factor increases the changes in the newly random generated solutions. Otherwise, it decreases the value of changes in the recently generated solutions. This methodology wisely improves the random exploration and convergence of the solutions in TO. In order to study the role of the various parameters in the algorithm, a variety of experiments are conducted and results are analyzed. In multiple case studies, it is shown that the final results are well comparable to the results obtained from the classic gradient-based methods. As an additional feature, a density filter is added to the algorithm to remove discontinuities and gray areas in the final solution resulting in robust outcomes in adjustable resolutions.

Highlights

  • The new candidate will be accepted if it improves the objective function or if its Boltzman probability is greater than a random number

  • A new method for Topology optimization (TO) of mechanical structures is proposed in this work

  • The proposed method uses the concept of Simulated Annealing (SA) with crystallization heuristic to determine the optimal shape

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In order to obtain the sensitivity information, the derivation of the objective function is required These methods have a fast convergence to the final results. Finding the sensitivity of the objective function is not easy [9] In such cases, where the objective function derivative is difficult to obtain, the non-gradient-based methods are more advantageous. Non-gradient based methods work only with the value of the objective functions [10,11]. Design Variable (MRDV) is used in the literature to enhance search performance [17] This approach still has high computational costs and the checkerboard pattern problem still remains. The results from the proposed method are compared with the results from the literature

Simulated Annealing
Topology Optimization
SA in TO
Cantilever Problem
MBB Problem
Heat Conduction Problem
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call