Abstract

The problem of knowledge in business was born several years ago. Indeed, new forms of work generate informal learning situations. This is how individuals develop their knowledge and skills. These situations are recognized by companies doing knowledge management. They encourage and make all to build communities of practice and knowledge exchange networks. This makes it possible to formalize the procedures, the good practices and the failures (feedback of experiences) thus to constitute sources of exploitable data. At the university, like any organization, each teacher has his/her own knowledge, his/her know-how, and he/she develops skills on his/her field of work in order to make that knowledge collected. This tacit or implicit teacher knowledge is shared so that each student can appropriate it and use it. However, depending on the nature of knowledge, and given the peculiarity of the pedagogical flow and its dependence on individuals (teacher), creating collective knowledge is not simple. During retirements, transfers, position change or any other academic life event, causing teacher displacement, knowledge may be lost. To deal with this problem, an empirical study of educational system perception of higher education in Morocco was carried out. Emphasis was placed on: pedagogical knowledge management, educational and e-learning platforms and overall student satisfaction. According to obtained results, we propose a smart education knowledge management system based on Artificial Intelligence to avoid loss of pedagogical knowledge and cover learning environment complexities and users' constraints.

Highlights

  • Knowledge Management (KM) has aroused much excitement in the recent years

  • After analysis of obtained results, we propose an intelligent architecture of a pedagogical knowledge management system

  • They think that discussions and exchanges are very important through smart education and e-learning platforms either with their own teachers (26.9%), or with others teachers of the same specialty (30.6%) and with professional trainers (38.8%)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Knowledge Management (KM) has aroused much excitement in the recent years. KM can be considered as the process of organizing and leveraging firms’ collective knowledge to achieve sustainability and to improve innovation [1], [2]. Evaluating an organization consists of considering in the most objective way its involvement and its intangible assets economic value. Intangible asset can be defined as company knowledge, experience, database and even employees well-being. One of intangible assets goals is related to value creation ability in the company (both in short term and over long term). It can be said that value creation is based on knowledge. It is recognized as a strategic resource and a critical source of competitive advantage [3]. A university like most organizations, should manage their intangible capital. Knowledge management in a university refers to the three main activities: teaching, research, and institutional management. Teachers’ retirement increases the need for sharing pedagogical objects and skills via pedagogical KM as a way to design, create and store teaching knowledge effectively

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call