Abstract

Over the last years, with the sudden and rising appeal of blockchain technology, some scholars have begun to investigate smart contracts, namely blockchain-enforced agreements. According to enthusiastic (and sometimes naive) views, smart contracts are supposed to allow parties to conduct transactions more efficiently than traditional or semantic contracts. This paper challenges that claim. I argue that because of the need for an efficiency-enhancing adaptation of institutional arrangements—a chief problem of transaction cost economics—smart contracts may incur higher transaction costs than semantic contracts.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call