Abstract

This study focuses on Livelihood Capital Index (LCI) as a useful tool in assessing the livelihood assets of rubber-based agroforestry farm households. It evaluates systematically all the livelihood capitals of rubber agroforestry farm households through developing an LCI. A total of 10 livelihood assets variables were broadly classified into five livelihood capital indicators namely; human, financial, physical, natural, and social. Data collected from 220 farm households through a questionnaire survey were normalized to construct five livelihood capital indicators and LCI. The appropriate weights for the livelihood capital indicators were assigned based on the principal component analysis (PCA). The average composite LCI was 0.49 for rubber-based agroforestry farm households and the human capital corresponds to the highest livelihood assets indicator (0.15) followed by financial (0.14), social (0.11), physical (0.05), and natural (0.05). The highest average LCI was reported by the rubber-based groundnut practice (0.54) followed by rubber-based cattle (0.53), cocoa (0.51), passion fruit (0.51), pepper (0.49), maize (0.49), and banana (0.48). Except for physical capital, it also indicates a statistically significant difference in livelihood capital indicators among the rubber agroforestry farmers and other income earners. A significant difference exists in the livelihood capital indicators except for human capital among the Divisional Secretariat. The outcome of this study suggests that the use of LCI is a more analytically rigorous comprehensive tool that can assess the livelihood of rubber agroforestry farmers and enable them to be improved their livelihood assets.

Highlights

  • Pla nting food crops a s the intercrops in na tura l rubber (Hevea brasiliensis Mull Arg.) la nds ma y contribute to household food security

  • The average number of years spent in a formal education institute by the household head is above 8 and it is comparatively low for cattle farmers

  • Rubber-based cattle farmers solely depend on rubber-based agroforestry income while rubber-based groundnut farmers (36%) and rubber-maize farmers (19%) receive the highest other farming income and non -farm income into their annual farm income

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pla nting food crops a s the intercrops in na tura l rubber (Hevea brasiliensis Mull Arg.) la nds ma y contribute to household food security. Approxima tely 90% of globa l rubber production comes from Asian countries, and Sri Lanka is the 14 th largest producer of Hevea rubber in the world as of the year 2020 [1]. Monera ga la District, a nontraditional region for rubber (situated in the Uva province) was selected for rubber cultivation in the early 1990s. Rubber agroforestry practices were mainly introduced with rubber cultivation at the immature phase of rubb er to compensate for the financial requirements of smallholder farmers until beginning latex harvesting

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call