Abstract

The environments in which organisms live and reproduce are rarely static, and as the environment changes, populations must evolve so that phenotypes match the challenges presented. The quantitative traits that map to environmental variables are underlain by hundreds or thousands of interacting genes whose allele frequencies and epistatic relationships must change appropriately for adaptation to occur. Extending an earlier model in which individuals possess an ecologically-critical trait encoded by gene networks of 16 to 256 genes and random or scale-free topology, I test the hypothesis that smaller, scale-free networks permit longer persistence times in a constantly-changing environment. Genetic architecture interacting with the rate of environmental change accounts for 78% of the variance in trait heritability and 66% of the variance in population persistence times. When the rate of environmental change is high, the relationship between network size and heritability is apparent, with smaller and scale-free networks conferring a distinct advantage for persistence time. However, when the rate of environmental change is very slow, the relationship between network size and heritability disappears and populations persist the duration of the simulations, without regard to genetic architecture. These results provide a link between genes and population dynamics that may be tested as the -omics and bioinformatics fields mature, and as we are able to determine the genetic basis of ecologically-relevant quantitative traits.

Highlights

  • Biologists are interested in the diversity of life and the mechanisms permitting maintenance of the diversity

  • Tukey HSD comparisons showed that dVA/dt for 16-gene networks was significantly different from all other network sizes, but there were no other significant differences

  • The ‘atypical’ mean estimates and large confidence intervals for 64–256 gene networks at the highest rate of environmental change reflects the rapid extinction of populations with these combinations of network size and rate of change

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Biologists are interested in the diversity of life and the mechanisms permitting maintenance of the diversity. Both evolutionary processes and ecological interactions provide important mechanisms to that end. Evolutionary biologists tend to focus on changes in lineages and relative fitnesses, whereas ecologists tend to focus on population changes and absolute fitness. The two fields are joined by the fact that environments are constantly changing and traits must evolve in order to permit population persistence. Anotonovics asserted that ecological change is almost always associated with changes in allele frequencies, i.e., evolution ([2]; tenet 5)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call