Abstract

In 2002, the provincial government of Ontario first announced plans to close all coal-burning thermoelectric generating stations. Facing the loss of local jobs should the local generating station close, Atikokan, Ontario, residents responded. This research seeks to answer the following question: What are Atikokan's historical pre-conditions and residents' attributes and perceptions which likely lead to the community's response, and do these characteristics relate back to the broader body of knowledge? Our study investigates the Atikokan Generating Station (AGS) conversion from coal to biomass wood pellets as a case, exploring the extent to which the community's identity played in response to the policy change. The current study takes a qualitative data analysis approach utilizing interviews with community members, current newspaper articles, past relevant consultant reports and archival data. Data collected were coded to themes using NVivo 10 software. Four emergent themes were identified and cross-validated. The emergent themes are i) traditions of resource-based industry congruent with producing and burning forest-based renewable fuels, ii) historical linkages to a strong entrepreneurial ethic, iii) community members' recognition of AGS's multifaceted role in the community and iv) strong community spirit and desire to fight for their town. These themes appear to have been prerequisite in order to successfully engage provincial government, and we demonstrate that these findings are somewhat corroborated back to the broader literature. Furthermore, as power generating authorities elsewhere grapple with demands to reduce carbon emissions, the Atikokan case may provide insight for other jurisdictions evaluating renewable energy adoption.

Highlights

  • In 2002, the provincial government of Ontario first announced plans to close all coal-burning thermoelectric generating stations

  • The themes include: i. traditions of resource-based industry congruent with producing and burning forest-based renewable fuels, ii. historical linkages to a strong entrepreneurial ethic, iii. community members' recognition of Atikokan Generating Station (AGS)'s multifaceted role in the community and iv. strong community spirit and desire to fight for their town

  • Our analysis included 20 interview participants of which 19 interviews mention the traditions of resource-based industry congruent with producing and burning forest-based renewable fuels, 15 mention historical linkages to a strong entrepreneurial ethic, 17 mention community members' recognition of AGS's multifaceted role in the community and 13 mention a strong community spirit and desire to fight for their town

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 2002, the provincial government of Ontario first announced plans to close all coal-burning thermoelectric generating stations. On 9 September 2002, a trajectory regarding energy policy in Ontario was established when former Premier Dalton McGuinty publically referred to the coal used in thermoelectric power generation as, ‘Environmental enemy number one. We're going to get rid of it’ [4] These were provocative statements, especially considering that in 2002 over 20% of the electricity produced in Ontario was from four coal-fired generating stations. Current Ontario Premiere Kathleen Wynne framed the argument not in terms of a feasible business case for power production, but rather in terms of government savings in other domains

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call