Abstract
The growing number of international dispute settlement mechanisms over the past decades has been critically addressed in academic literature. Concerns have also been voiced as to whether ‘small states’ as specific actors are disadvantaged in their participation in international dispute resolution. When such dispute resolution mechanisms are incorporated in regional integration schemes, similar concerns arise: small states participating in these integration processes, it is argued, face particular challenges due to their lack of quantitative resources, not least due to their narrow population base. This article analyses dispute resolution mechanisms of two regional integration schemes—the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) and the currently negotiated Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations (PACER)-Plus—in order to ascertain whether these mechanisms fit challenges resulting from the smallness of the participating member states.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
