Abstract

Structures associated with the small-scale module called “minicolumn” can be observed frequently in the cerebral cortex. However, the description of functional characteristics remains obscure. A significant confounding factor is the marked variability both in the definition of a minicolumn and in the diagnostic markers for identifying a minicolumn (see for review, Jones, 2000; DeFelipe et al., 2002; Rockland and Ichinohe, 2004). Within a minicolumn, cell columns are easily visualized by conventional Nissl staining. Dendritic bundles were first discovered with Golgi methods, but are more easily seen with microtubule-associated protein 2 immunohistochemistry. Myelinated axon bundles can be seen by Tau immunohistochemistry or myelin staining. Axon bundles of double bouquet cell can be seen by calbindin immunohistochemistry. The spatial interrelationship among these morphological elements is more complex than expected and is neither clear nor unanimously agreed upon. In this review, I would like to focus first on the minicolumnar structure found in layers 1 and 2 of the rat granular retrosplenial cortex. This modular structure was first discovered as a combination of prominent apical dendritic bundles from layer 2 pyramidal neurons and spatially matched thalamocortical patchy inputs (Wyss et al., 1990). Further examination showed more intricate components of this modular structure, which will be reviewed in this paper. Second, the postnatal development of this structure and potential molecular players for its formation will be reviewed. Thirdly, I will discuss how this modular organization is transformed in mutant rodents with a disorganized layer structure in the cerebral cortex (i.e., reeler mouse and shaking rat Kawasaki). Lastly, the potential significance of this type of module will be discussed.

Highlights

  • Morphologic small-scale modules or “minicolumn” structures can be observed frequently in the cerebral cortex

  • This modular structure was first described as a module consisting of a combination of prominent apical dendritic bundles from layer 2 pyramidal neurons and thalamocortical patchy inputs, which are spatially matched with the dendritic bundles (Wyss et al, 1990)

  • Double-immunofluorescence for OCAM and Vesicular glutamate transporter 1 (VGLUT1) or VGLUT2 has shown that OCAM- and VGLUT1-positive modules are co-localized and that OCAM- and VGLUT2-positive modules are interdigitated in layer 1 (Figures 1 and 4). These results underscore the notion that OCAM-negative (i.e., microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2)-positive) apical dendritic bundles from layer 2 pyramidal neurons are targeted by thalamocortical terminals and that OCAM-positive aggregations of apical dendritic tufts of layer 5 pyramidal neurons are targeted by corticocortical inputs (Shibata, 1993; Van Groen and Wyss, 1995, 2003; Miró-Bernié et al, 2006; Ichinohe et al, 2008)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Morphologic small-scale modules or “minicolumn” structures can be observed frequently in the cerebral cortex. This modular structure was first described as a module consisting of a combination of prominent apical dendritic bundles from layer 2 pyramidal neurons and thalamocortical patchy inputs, which are spatially matched with the dendritic bundles (Wyss et al, 1990).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call