Abstract

According to American Thyroid Association (ATA) guideline, papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) with minimal extrathyroidal extension (mETE) is classified at "intermediate risk" of persistent/recurrent disease. However, the impact of mETE per se on patients' outcome is not fully understood. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of mETE in patients with PTC not submitted to therapeutic or prophylactic lymph node dissection, according to tumor size and other prognostic factors. We retrospectively evaluated a total of 514 PTC patients: 127 (24.7%) had mETE (pT3Nx) and 387 (75.3%) had negative margins (pT1-2Nx). At a median follow-up of 9.1years, patients were divided in two groups: patients with "good outcome" (no evidence of disease) and patients with "poor outcome" (persistent structural disease or recurrent disease or tumor-related death). The rate of patients with "poor outcome" was significantly higher in patients with mETE compared with patients with negative margins (11.8 versus 5.1%; OR 2.4576, 95% CI 1.2178-4.9594, p=0.01). However, mETE was significantly associated with poor outcome only in patients with tumors larger than 1.5cm. mETE is an unfavorable prognostic factor in tumors larger than 1.5cm, suggesting that, in the absence of other unfavorable characteristics, smaller tumors with mETE should be classified and managed as "low risk" tumors.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call