Abstract

Small mammals are key components of forest ecosystems, playing vital roles for numerous groups of forest organisms: they exert bottom-up and top-down regulatory effects on vertebrate and invertebrate populations, respectively; they are fungus- and seed-dispersers and bioturbators. Therefore, preserving or restoring the diversity of small mammal communities may help maintain the functions of these ecosystems. In Romania, a country with low-intensity forest management and a high percentage of natural forests compared to other European countries, an overview of forest small mammal diversity and habitat type use is lacking, and our study aimed to fill this gap. We also aimed to partition the total small mammal diversity of Romanian forests into the alpha (plot-level), beta, and delta (among forest types) diversities, as well as further partition beta diversity into its spatial (among plots) and temporal (among years) components. We surveyed small mammals by live trapping in eight types of forest across Romania. We found that small mammal abundance was significantly higher in lowland than in mountain forests, but species richness was similar, being associated with the diversity of tree canopy, with the highest values in mixed forests. In contrast, small mammal heterogeneity was related to overall habitat heterogeneity. As predicted, community composition was most distinct in poplar plantations, where forest specialists coexist with open habitat species. Most of the diversity was represented by alpha diversity. Because of strong fluctuations in population density of dominant rodents, the temporal component of beta heterogeneity was larger than the spatial component, but species richness also presented an important temporal turnover. Our results show the importance of the time dimension in the design of the surveys aiming at estimating the diversity of small mammal communities, both at the local and regional scales.

Highlights

  • One of the main goals of biological conservation is the identification and preservation of sites, habitats, and landscapes that act as biodiversity hotspots, hosting a high level of floristical and faunistical richness

  • Microtus levis was represented by 10 individuals, but they were captured in only one forest, during three of the nine surveys, so this species was not included in the selection

  • In lowland forests, abundance was significantly higher for A. agrarius (W = 2035.5, p < 0.001), with a mean abundance of 5.45 ind./100 trap nights (TN) (95% confidence interval—CI = 2.01, 8.9) in lowlands and 1.23 ind./100 TN in mountains, and A. flavicollis (W = 1775.5, p = 0.038), with 13.66 ind./100 TN in lowlands and 8.45 ind./100 TN

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the main goals of biological conservation is the identification and preservation of sites, habitats, and landscapes that act as biodiversity hotspots, hosting a high level of floristical and faunistical richness. The classical concept of diversity—the variety of organisms in a community, known as alpha diversity—was developed to encompass multiple spatial scales: gamma diversity—the landscape scale diversity, and epsilon diversity—the diversity of entire geographic regions [1]. The degree of change in species composition among communities and landscapes is a measure of diversity itself, defined as beta and delta diversity. The landscape-scale (gamma) diversity results from the combination of community-level (alpha) diversity and among-community (beta) diversity. Diversity partitioning complements existing models in conservation biology and may provide a unique approach to understanding species diversity across spatial scales [4]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call