Abstract
Under some conditions, behavioral research includes statistical tests to assess the probability of experimental outcomes. Occasionally, sample sizes are insufficient to fulfill the assumptions of traditional parametric procedures. The following study assessed the statistical advantages, correspondence, and accuracy of univariate analyses when small-n samples are calculated in both randomized and traditional/parametric formats. Specifically, we compared probability values for both parametric and randomized two-sample independent t-tests across a series of Monte Carlo, pseudorandom two-group data sets of equal size. In doing so, we identified some patterns of probability change associated with decreasing group size.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
