Abstract
Background Antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction (FGR) prompts antepartum surveillance to reduce perinatal mortality, yet most cases of FGR are undetected. Objective This study aims to compare rates of adverse neonatal outcomes when FGR is detected versus undetected. Study Design Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) newborns (birth weight < 10% for gestational age) delivered at the Magee-Women's Hospital in Pittsburgh, PA from 2003 to 2010 were divided into three groups: those whom did not undergo third-trimester fetal growth ultrasound (SGA-no US), were appropriate for gestational age (AGA) by ultrasound (SGA-undetected), or were FGR by ultrasound (SGA-detected). We then compared rates of 5-minute Apgar < 4 and neonatal death (ND), with AGA newborns as the referent. Results Out of 29,885 neonates, 2,475 (8.3%) were SGA. Out of the 826 (33%) SGA neonates who underwent growth ultrasound, 185 (22%) were considered FGR. In the SGA-no US group, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for Apgar < 4 was 2.84 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28-6.29) and 3.87 (95% CI: 2.09-7.18) for ND. The risk of Apgar < 4 (aOR: 3.10, 95% CI: 0.93-10.28) and ND (aOR: 2.16, 95% CI: 0.66-7.14) were not significantly elevated for SGA-undetected neonates, while SGA-detected neonates were most at risk, with an aOR of 18.20 (95% CI: 6.82-48.60) for Apgar < 4 and 18.24 (95% CI: 7.90-42.13) for ND. Conclusion Fetal growth ultrasound effectively stratifies risk amongst SGA neonates.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.