Abstract

This study pilots the collective action model “Small Farmers Large Field (SFLF)” to overcome the disadvantages faced by millions of small and marginal farmers due to diseconomies of scale and lack of bargaining power in the supply chain. This model is participatory and flexible and allows small farmers to benefit from achieving economies of scale by organizing themselves into groups and synchronizing and harmonizing selected operations. It was piloted in two villages of Odisha, an eastern Indian state, with 112 farmers (35 females and 77 males). These farmers organized themselves into groups and synchronized their operations such as nursery bed management, transplanting, and harvesting collectively to achieve economies of scale. The SFLF farmers purchased inputs (seed and fertilizer) and sold paddy as a group to increase their bargaining power in price negotiations. The results from this pilot study showed that the participating farmers almost doubled their profits. Apart from the monetary benefits, these farmers saved time in many joint activities, including input (seed and fertilizer) purchase, paddy sale, and nursery bed management. Other important benefits of the harmonization and synchronization of farming operations were social harmony and sustainability of the farming system.

Highlights

  • According to the 2015–16 Agricultural Census, 78 percent of Indian farmers are small and marginal with landholding of less than 1 hectare

  • This study clearly identifies community participation to be the key to ensuring sustainable changes at the grass-roots level, and decided to adopt a participatory action research (PAR) approach

  • 54 farmers participated by allocating 90 acres of their individual plots

Read more

Summary

Introduction

According to the 2015–16 Agricultural Census, 78 percent of Indian farmers are small and marginal with landholding of less than 1 hectare. Under this model, the participating farmers organize themselves into groups to purchase inputs, contract a machine service provider for transplanting and harvesting, and synchronize their operations by adopting a single variety, establishing a group nursery, and transplanting and harvesting around the same time, essentially converting their small landholdings into a large field or patch. This approach enables small farmers to cut cost by bulk purchases, improve efficiency by synchronizing operations, and improve quality by having a single variety of certified seed and improved production practices. The final section includes results and policy reforms needed for scaling up of the SFLF model

Pilot sites
Methodology and data collection
SFLF participation and implementation
Group nursery development
Mechanization
Better access to inputs
Better market linkage
Land preparation and water management
Social network building and support of exchange labor
Cost‐return analysis
Policy reforms needed for faster scaling up of the SFLF model
Concluding remarks
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call