Abstract

Predator–prey interactions must be considered when aiming to enhance populations by releasing artificially reared individuals into natural environments. Released individuals create an abundance of prey for predators, and a basic hypothesis of predator–prey interactions suggests that predators select large prey due to the high caloric content. An alternative hypothesis is that small individuals are vulnerable to predation due to their poor predator avoidance. This study tested these hypotheses using stocked chum (Oncorhynchus keta) and masu (Oncorhynchus masou) salmon fry and piscivorous salmonids in marine and riverine habitats in Hokkaido, Japan. Stomach contents were sampled from predators, and fork length of prey fry was measured. Then, their fork length was compared with whole stocked fry (range of mean fork length (±SD): 45.8 ± 2.55 to 49.2 ± 2.76 mm) for each habitat. As a result, prey fry were ∼3%–6% smaller than whole stocked fry, even under a prey-abundant condition (i.e., just after hatchery reared salmon fry were stocked). Piscivorous salmonids pursue schooling fry, and small fry may be easily caught due to their slow speed in avoiding predators.

Highlights

  • Predator–prey interactions play a key role in population dynamics of both predator and prey species (Case 1999)

  • The linear mixed model revealed that the body size of prey fry did not vary depending on the body size of predator as we expected, the body size of prey fry differed among sampling locations (Fig. 2; Table 2)

  • The results supported the hypothesis that smaller individuals are exposed to more intense predation than larger individuals in all sampling locations, prey size differed among the sampling locations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Predator–prey interactions play a key role in population dynamics of both predator and prey species (Case 1999). Predator–prey interactions have been studied from the perspective of understanding basic theories of population dynamics, and evaluating the efficiency of managing species that are important biological resources and (or) endangered. The outcomes of predator–prey interactions depend on the predator’s prey selection and foraging (or handling) behavioral traits and the prey’s ability to avoid the predator. The ability to avoid predators is mainly related to the speed of the prey, which is fundamentally determined by body size (i.e., larger prey can move more quickly), but physical condition and sickness influence speed (Tollit et al 1997; Lundvall et al 1999; Genovart et al 2010).

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call