Abstract

IN A RECENT SURVEY the community, 74 percent respondents stated when they initially started their graduate work, they planned to become a professor and of 74%, 80% report[ed] feeling fairly certain or completely certain professorship was the career they would pursue (Rogers). (1) These statistics match my personal experience and my conversations with other grad students. I am one those grad students who originally planned--and continues to plan--a career in a tenure-track position. Yet because the sheer relentless, nigh apocalyptic nature job market forecasts, I'm now in the position considering careers beyond academia. For the past year I've been attending workshops at my university's Centre for Career Action, talking with my supervisor, other professors, and career counselors, meeting with mitacs representatives, conducting informational interviews with people in the private sector, and trying to immerse myself in the extremely active online discussions about the academic job market and the alt-ac path. with said, I'd like to present some my concerns and ideas from the perspective a grad student. What I'd like to suggest is an open, curious, iterative, versatile, non-teleological, or even antifragile, approach to career preparation for humanities PhDs. In the survey quoted above, the respondents, in their postacademic careers, did not end up in any specific sector. When humanities scholars move beyond academia, there is no set path. According to Susan Basalla and Maggie Debelius, in So What Are You Going to Do With That?: Finding Careers Outside Academia, many alt-ac career paths only have a logical continuity to in retrospect (34); Basalla and Debelius therefore suggest be[ing] open to unexpected possibilities (74). Similarly, in Geoffrey Moore's presentation, Crossing the Chasm from Academia to Business, at Stanford University's Bibliotech conference (a conference for Connecting Liberal Arts PhDs with Forward-Thinking Companies), he claims humanities PhDs have skills to offer every sector business, provided we're willing to learn a totally new vocabulary. The vocabulary we currently use (semiotics, John Donne, and so on) won't translate, but what we can do with vocabulary translates extremely well to any sector. At another bibliotech talk, Patrick Byrne, ceo and founder Overstock.com (and a philosophy PhD), argues in the private sector humanities scholars make naturally good team leaders and are good at nurturing a team's ideas. Some businesses have realized humanities scholars offer a unique skill set can be trained or modified to adapt to very different industries. There are now management consulting firms hiring not just mbas and stem scholars but humanities PhDs as well, because the raw horsepower in critical thinking which the PhD serves as evidence (quoted in Montell). Geoffrey Moore uses the metaphor professional football teams draft running and track stars who've never played football, because the team is after the best available and the team can train the athlete for a specific football position. My point is not just humanities scholars can succeed in other industries but the PhD itself can be leveraged if PhD students are willing to branch out and if they are given the chances to do so. Often they need something else on the resume, since obviously not every company will take a chance on the best available athlete. For grad students this will require early open-mindedness toward pursuing a career other than as a tenured professor. Cal Newport, in Good They Can't Ignore You, argues the uncritical repetition advice like follow your passion is downright dangerous and damaging when people become convinced that somewhere there's a magic 'right' job waiting for them (22). Doesn't this ring a bell, in light the frightening stories one hears about PhD adjuncts moving around the continent for years in a series low-pay, limited-term contract positions--in some cases even going on food stamps (see Patton)--all in the hope they'll finally land magic right job, even as the odds become increasingly against them? …

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.