Abstract
Slovenia is a relatively well-developed country with regard to direct-democratic instruments and their legal review. A reasonable number of legal limits are imposed on direct democracy in Slovenia. Slovene legal doctrine distinguishes between formal and substantive legal limits of direct democracy. Substantive limits may be explicit or implicit. Explicit limits are provided in legislation, whereas implicit limits derive from the principle of constitutional democracy. Explicit substantive legal limits exist only for referendum decision-making, while implicit limits are inherent to all instruments of direct democracy. Formal legal limits as to unity of substance and unity of form are not provided in Slovenia; however, certain formal requirements are in place for each instrument of direct democracy.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
