Abstract
Despite the plethora of works on empirical path loss prediction in wireless networks, just a little is addressing rural environments. In this work, we consider slope-based empirical path loss models in wireless networks at 2.4 GHz using off-the-shelf 802.11n (one transmitter and two receivers at 150Mbp and 300Mbps). We define three scenarios usually observed in rural environment. Subsequently, we do a measurement campaign and compare results to selected prediction models. We later propose a new model based on Liechty model. The new model is compared to Liechty model in Non-Line of Sight (NLOS) and combined (LOS and NLOS) scenarios. The Liechty model provided a better prediction in NLOS scenario while the new model outperforms in combined scenario. In addition, we observe that the data rate also influences the prediction. Especially in free space scenarios, the receiver with the greater data rate provides a smaller mean error and standard deviation.
Highlights
Wireless networks are incontestably an appealing solution to bridge the digital divide between rural and urban regions [1]
The mean error and the standard deviation are used as indicators to compare the predicted values to the measured ones
We defined three scenarios tied to rural regions and we conducted a measurement campaign
Summary
Wireless networks are incontestably an appealing solution to bridge the digital divide between rural and urban regions [1]. This easy-to-deploy technology, especially in hard-to-wire regions or emergency situation [2], can provide bad results and be useless if the network is not well planned [3]. A frequently used tool to predict the quality of signal is the empirical path loss model. Such a model is usually tied to a specific environment because of the particular configuration. Despite the great number of path loss models [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], just few are focusing on propagation at 2.4 GHz [10], [11]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.