Slip rates and paleoearthquakes along the east segment of the Guanggaishan–Dieshan fault zone, West Qinling Range, NW China

Abstract

The WNW-trending Guanggaishan–Dieshan fault (GDF) is located in the West Qinling Range at a site of tectonic junction between the Tibetan plateau, the Sichuan basin and the Ordos block. Tectonically, this region is bounded by the East Kunlun fault to the southwest, the West Qinling fault to the north, and the Longmenshan fault to the southeast. The activity of the GDF is essentially related with the northeastward expansion of the Tibetan Plateau and associated strain partition between the East Kunlun fault and the West Qinling fault. This study reported the sense of fault movement, rate of fault slip, and the timing of three paleoseismic events on the east segment of the Guanggaishan–Dieshan fault (EGDF) with which no historical earthquake has been documented before. We focused our investigation on three branch faults in the central part of the EGDF using a range of study methods, e.g. structural mapping, paleoseismological trenching, unmanned aircraft vehicle photogrammetry, differential GPS survey, as well as radiocarbon and optically stimulated luminescence dating. Our new results highlighted: (1) the EGDF is dominated by the left-lateral sense of movement with a minor component of dip slip, (2) the range-bounding branch is characterized by a maximum left-lateral slip rate of 0.72 ± 0.34 mm/year and a maximum vertical-slip rate of 0.13 ± 0.03 mm/year, respectively. Kinematics of the EGDF is similar to many other active faults in the West Qinling Range, together they play a joint role in accommodating and transferring the residual left-lateral slip of the East Kunlun Fault. Three paleoseismic events were identified on the range-bounding fault based on two types of event markers: cut-cover relation and colluvial deposition. The ages of the most recent two events are estimated to be 2765–3320 cal. year BP and 12,775–13,005 cal. year BP and the age of the oldest event is as early as 18,495–32,950 cal. year BP. In contrast, there is no compelling evidence to show paleoseismic event along the rest two branches, and further work is needed to demonstrate this.