Abstract

Introduction: the aim of this work is to assess whether renorrhaphy with the sliding-clip technique improves perioperative and early functional outcomes compared with traditional renorrhaphy in a contemporary series of patients undergoing open partial nephrectomy (PN).Material and Methods: A single-center single-surgeon cohort of 107 consecutive patients treated with open PN between July 2013 and March 2017 was analyzed. A study group of 48 patients undergoing renorrhaphy with the sliding-clip technique was compared with a control group of 59 patients receiving traditional renorrhaphy. Outcome measures were operative room (OR) time, warm ischemia time (WIT), estimated blood loss (EBL), rate of overall 90-day postoperative complications, and percentage change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (PCE) > 10% and >20% 1 month postoperatively.Results: OR time (p = 0.02), WIT (p = 0.01) and EBL (p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the study versus control group. Overall 90-day postoperative complications were observed in 8 (16.7%) versus 21 (35.7%) patients in the study versus control group (p = 0.02). PCE > 10% and >20% 1 month postoperatively were observed in approximately 40% and 20% of patients, respectively, with no significant differences between groups. On multivariable analysis, a sliding-clip technique was an independent predictor of WIT >20 min and/or EBL >500 ml (OR 0.238, 95%CI 0.074–0.767; p = 0.01) and overall 90-day postoperative complications (OR 0.360, 95%CI 0.151-0.856; p = 0.02).Conclusions: In patients undergoing open PN, renorrhaphy with the sliding-clip technique was associated with better intraoperative and postoperative outcomes compared with traditional renorrhaphy. No significant differences were observed in terms of early renal function change.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call