Abstract

Fractional-order time and space derivatives are one way to augment the classical diffusion equation so that it accounts for the non-Gaussian processes often observed in heterogeneous materials. Two-dimensional phase diagrams—plots whose axes represent the fractional derivative order—typically display: (i) points corresponding to distinct diffusion propagators (Gaussian, Cauchy), (ii) lines along which specific stochastic models apply (Lévy process, subordinated Brownian motion), and (iii) regions of super- and sub-diffusion where the mean squared displacement grows faster or slower than a linear function of diffusion time (i.e., anomalous diffusion). Three-dimensional phase cubes are a convenient way to classify models of anomalous diffusion (continuous time random walk, fractional motion, fractal derivative). Specifically, each type of fractional derivative when combined with an assumed power law behavior in the diffusion coefficient renders a characteristic picture of the underlying particle motion. The corresponding phase diagrams, like pages in a sketch book, provide a portfolio of representations of anomalous diffusion. The anomalous diffusion phase cube employs lines of super-diffusion (Lévy process), sub-diffusion (subordinated Brownian motion), and quasi-Gaussian behavior to stitch together equivalent regions.

Highlights

  • Fractional calculus extends the local, memory-free concepts of Newton and Leibniz [1,2], but this growth entails a mosaic of noninteger derivatives whose diverse properties can overwhelm new users

  • In the field of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), this question can be focused on the Bloch–Torrey equation [6], and on the selection of the proper fractional-order tools for generalizing relaxation and diffusion phenomena that occur in complex biological tissues

  • The mean squared displacement (MSD) appears as a line of quasi-Gaussian behavior on the phase diagram separating regions of sub- and super-diffusion

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fractional calculus (non-integer order integration and differentiation) extends the local, memory-free concepts of Newton and Leibniz [1,2], but this growth entails a mosaic of noninteger derivatives whose diverse properties can overwhelm new users. Stanford.edu/entries/) (accessed on 20 May 2021) is not part of fractional calculus, the operator notation in fractional calculus was not formulated to keep all users happy; we must be ever wary of the local terminology. It should be kept in mind that interchanging operations between fractional and integer-order calculus should be viewed with suspicion; one should not mix the tools and notation together any more carelessly than trying to assemble a motor using parts with both metric and British Standard Whitworth threads [11]. In the results below we will employ a restricted set of fractional derivatives and identify the local notation in a consistent manner for each case

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.