Abstract
SummaryThe hippocampus plays a critical role in sleep-related memory processes [1, 2, 3], but it is unclear which specific sleep features are dependent upon this brain structure. The examination of sleep physiology in patients with focal bilateral hippocampal damage and amnesia could supply important evidence regarding these links. However, there is a dearth of such studies, despite these patients providing compelling insights into awake cognition [4, 5]. Here, we sought to identify the contribution of the hippocampus to the sleep phenotype by characterizing sleep via comprehensive qualitative and quantitative analyses in memory-impaired patients with selective bilateral hippocampal damage and matched control participants using in-home polysomnography on 4 nights. We found that, compared to control participants, patients had significantly reduced slow-wave sleep—likely due to decreased density of slow waves—as well as slow-wave activity. In contrast, slow and fast spindles were indistinguishable from those of control participants. Moreover, patients expressed slow oscillations (SOs), and SO-fast spindle coupling was observed. However, on closer scrutiny, we noted that the timing of spindles within the SO cycle was delayed in the patients. The shift of patients’ spindles into the later phase of the up-state within the SO cycle may indicate a mismatch in timing across the SO-spindle-ripple events that are associated with memory consolidation [6, 7]. The substantial effect of selective bilateral hippocampal damage on large-scale oscillatory activity in the cortex suggests that, as with awake cognition, the hippocampus plays a significant role in sleep physiology, which may, in turn, be necessary for efficacious episodic memory.
Highlights
Often PSG studies are performed in a sleep laboratory, but this can adversely affect sleep quality
We examined sleep architecture in four patients with focal lesions to the hippocampus bilaterally and with a significant episodic memory deficit for their personal past experiences (STAR Methods; Figure S1; Tables S1 and S2)
We conducted the analyses of PSG recordings using 3 subsequent nights, separated on average by 18 days ± 7, allowing for an assessment of sleep architecture consistency, and ensuring that results were not driven by an individual night
Summary
Often PSG studies are performed in a sleep laboratory, but this can adversely affect sleep quality. We recorded PSG in participants’ own homes on 4 nights. During the first habituation night, participants were familiarized with the PSG equipment and procedure, and WatchPAT data were collected. PSG data from this night were not included in the analyses. We conducted the analyses of PSG recordings using 3 subsequent nights, separated on average by 18 days ± 7, allowing for an assessment of sleep architecture consistency, and ensuring that results were not driven by an individual night
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.