Abstract

BackgroundDuring sleep animals are relatively unresponsive and unaware of their environment, and therefore, more exposed to predation risk than alert and awake animals. This vulnerability might influence when, where and how animals sleep depending on the risk of predation perceived before going to sleep. Less clear is whether animals remain sensitive to predation cues when already asleep.Methodology/Principal FindingsWe experimentally tested whether great tits are able to detect the chemical cues of a common nocturnal predator while sleeping. We predicted that birds exposed to the scent of a mammalian predator (mustelid) twice during the night would not go into torpor (which reduces their vigilance) and hence would not reduce their body temperature as much as control birds, exposed to the scent of another mammal that does not represent a danger for the birds (rabbit). As a consequence of the higher body temperature birds exposed to the scent of a predator are predicted to have a higher resting metabolic rate (RMR) and to lose more body mass. In the experiment, all birds decreased their body temperature during the night, but we did not find any influence of the treatment on body temperature, RMR, or body mass.Conclusions/SignificanceOur results suggest that birds are not able to detect predator chemical cues while sleeping. As a consequence, antipredatory strategies taken before sleep, such as roosting sites inspection, may be crucial to cope with the vulnerability to predation risk while sleeping.

Highlights

  • Despite being one of the most frequent behaviours of animals, sleep is one of the less studied behaviours

  • The body temperature of birds was decreasing while they were exposed to the scent for the first time (F1,26 = 67.47, p,0.0001), but this was not modulated by the treatment to which birds were exposed (F1,26 = 0.27, p = 0.60) and the interaction between time and treatment was not significant (F1,26 = 0.70, p = 0.41; Fig. 2b)

  • Our results suggest that sleeping birds are not able to detect the chemical cues of predators, as they did not exhibit any response to the predator treatment in the physiological variables that we measured here

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite being one of the most frequent behaviours of animals, sleep is one of the less studied behaviours (see [1] for a review). Sleep has benefits [8], and has costs. An animal is less responsive to its environment, and may fail to detect cues associated with the presence of a predator. The balance between the benefits and costs may determine when, where and how animals sleep [1]. During sleep animals are relatively unresponsive and unaware of their environment, and more exposed to predation risk than alert and awake animals. This vulnerability might influence when, where and how animals sleep depending on the risk of predation perceived before going to sleep. Less clear is whether animals remain sensitive to predation cues when already asleep

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call