Abstract
BackgroundSleep-wakefulness cycles are an essential diagnostic criterion for disorders of consciousness (DOC), differentiating prolonged DOC from coma. Specific sleep features, like the presence of sleep spindles, are an important marker for the prognosis of recovery from DOC. Based on increasing evidence for a link between sleep and neuronal plasticity, understanding sleep in DOC might facilitate the development of novel methods for rehabilitation. Yet, well-controlled studies of sleep in DOC are lacking. Here, we aimed to quantify, on a reliable evaluation basis, the distribution of behavioral and neurophysiological sleep patterns in DOC over a 24-h period while controlling for environmental factors (by recruiting a group of conscious tetraplegic patients who resided in the same hospital).MethodsWe evaluated the distribution of sleep and wakefulness by means of polysomnography (EEG, EOG, EMG) and video recordings in 32 DOC patients (16 unresponsive wakefulness syndrome [UWS], 16 minimally conscious state [MCS]), and 10 clinical control patients with severe tetraplegia. Three independent raters scored the patients’ polysomnographic recordings.ResultsAll but one patient (UWS) showed behavioral and electrophysiological signs of sleep. Control and MCS patients spent significantly more time in sleep during the night than during daytime, a pattern that was not evident in UWS. DOC patients (particularly UWS) exhibited less REM sleep than control patients. Forty-four percent of UWS patients and 12% of MCS patients did not have any REM sleep, while all control patients (100%) showed signs of all sleep stages and sleep spindles. Furthermore, no sleep spindles were found in 62% of UWS patients and 21% of MCS patients. In the remaining DOC patients who had spindles, their number and amplitude were significantly lower than in controls.ConclusionsThe distribution of sleep signs in DOC over 24 h differs significantly from the normal sleep-wakefulness pattern. These abnormalities of sleep in DOC are independent of external factors such as severe immobility and hospital environment.
Highlights
Sleep-wakefulness cycles are an essential diagnostic criterion for disorders of consciousness (DOC), differentiating prolonged DOC from coma
While clinical control (CC) (t(9) = 4.21, p = .0023, d = 1.40) and minimally conscious state (MCS) (t(15) = 2.41, p = .03, d = 0.62) patients spent a greater amount of time with closed eyes during the night than daytime, this pattern was not evident in unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) patients (t(15) = 0.35, p = .73, d = 0.09, BF01 = 3.7; see Fig. 1a)
One UWS patient did not show any signs of electrophysiological sleep despite episodes of closed eyes
Summary
Sleep-wakefulness cycles are an essential diagnostic criterion for disorders of consciousness (DOC), differentiating prolonged DOC from coma. Acquired brain injury can result in a prolonged state of severe disturbance or even the lack of awareness, referred to as severe disorders of consciousness (DOC). According to the widely accepted definition [1], the presence of the sleep-wakefulness cycle serves as an important symptom distinguishing DOC from acute coma. This alternation of sleep and wakefulness, is evaluated only at a behavioral level, that is, as the presence of episodes with open and closed eyes. More recent data indicate that, on the one hand, in some DOC patients, the behavioral sleep-wakefulness cycles do not correspond to any neurophysiological signs of sleep and wakefulness [2]. The differential diagnosis between the two is extremely challenging and error-prone [5], which is complicated by strong fluctuations of the arousal level and the associated level of consciousness, in MCS [6], and in UWS [7], generating variability in the results of repeated behavioral evaluations [8]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
