Abstract

The skull base surgery is one of the most demanding surgeries. There are different structures that can be injured easily, by operating in the skull base. It is very important for the neurosurgeon to choose the right approach in order to reach the lesion without harming the other intact structures. Due to the pioneering work of Cushing, Hirsch, Yasargil, Krause, Dandy and other dedicated neurosurgeons, it is possible to address the tumor and other lesions in the anterior, the mid-line and the posterior cranial base. With the transsphenoidal, the frontolateral, the pterional and the lateral suboccipital approach nearly every region of the skull base is exposable.In the current state many different skull base approaches are described for various neurosurgical diseases during the last 20 years. The selection of an approach may differ from country to country, e.g., in the United States orbitozygomaticotomy for special lesions of the anterior skull base or petrosectomy for clivus meningiomas, are found more frequently than in Europe.The reason for writing the review was the question: Are there keyhole approaches with which someone can deal with a vast variety of lesions in the neurosurgical field?In my opinion the different surgical approaches mentioned above cover almost 95% of all skull base tumors and lesions. In the following text these approaches will be described.These approaches are:1) pterional approach2) frontolateral approach3) transsphenoidal approach4) suboccipital lateral approachThese approaches can be extended and combined with each other. In the following we want to enhance this philosophy.

Highlights

  • ConclusionThe unilateral subfrontal, pterional and lateral suboccipital approach, the surgeon can expose almost any skull base involvement

  • The skull base surgery is one of the most demanding surgeries

  • Historical overview In the 1970 s Yasargil [1,2] laid to the foundation of the pterional approach

Read more

Summary

Conclusion

The unilateral subfrontal, pterional and lateral suboccipital approach, the surgeon can expose almost any skull base involvement. The introduction of microsurgical techniques in the 1960 s [31,32] is portrayed as a fundamental reason for the subsequently arising development in skull base surgery and the evolution of the approaches. Extension of approaches can be done in an interdisciplinary fashion with colleagues from other faculties like ENT or maxillofacical surgery, which is recommended by the author. While ENT can help accessing the skull base, e.g., in acoustic neuroma surgery [33] or by the help of an endoscope transnasally, maxillofacial surgery offers the wide spectrum of approaches through the oral cavity and maxilla. Authors' contributions MS obtained clinical photos, coordinated, and drafted the manuscript. JT, CL, AH and KB provided critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content. T©Hhe2ias0dai1s&r0taiNSncceleOhckiopslOezannvecaAtoicallaclo;begllsiyecse2fanr0ros1tmei0ce,l:e2hBd:it1oti6spMt:r/ei/bdwuCwtewdn.thureanaldLdetardnt.hdeneteckrmonscooflothgey.Correga/tciovnetCeonmt/2m/1o/n1s6Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

12. Krause F
17. Horsley V
28. Cushing H
Findings
32. Kurze T
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call