Abstract

Objective To compare skin-to-skin care (SSC) given by mother and father for preterm neonatal pain control by premature infant pain profile (PIPP) score. Methods 64 stable preterm (28-36 weeks gestational age) neonates born at a level-3 neonatal intensive care unit were included in the trial. Random allocation with the help of a computer-generated sequence was done. In group A, SSC was given by the mother 15 minutes before the first heel-stick, and subsequently, SSC was given by the father before the second heel-stick. In group B, the sequence of SSC provider was reversed. Blinded PIPP score assessment at 0, 1, and 5 minutes of heel-stick were done by two independent assessors using video recording. Results The mean (SD) birth weight was 1665.18 (339.35) grams, and mean (SD) gestational age was 34.28 (2.24) weeks. The PIPP score at 0, 1, and 5 minutes had no statistical or clinically significant differences between both groups (PIPP score mean (SD) at 0 minute = 3.20 (1.11) vs. 3.01 (1.29), p value = 0.38; 1 minute = 8.59 (4.27) vs. 8.26 (4.08), p value = 0.66; 5 minutes = 3.79 (1.40) vs. 3.93 (1.99), p value = 0.65 in SSC by mother and father group, respectively). Furthermore, there was no statistical difference between the groups for any components of the PIPP score (all p values > 0.05). The PIPP score at 5 minutes almost attained the 0-minute level in both the groups. Conclusion Father is as effective as the mother for providing skin-to-skin care for preterm neonatal pain control. This trial is registered with CTRI/2018/01/016783.

Highlights

  • Preterm neonates are exposed to multiple painful procedures and interventions during their period of neonatal intensive care

  • A total of 86 consecutive neonates admitted in the NICU were screened

  • The refusal of consent was due to the unavailability of the fathers secondary to professional commitments

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Preterm neonates are exposed to multiple painful procedures and interventions during their period of neonatal intensive care. Painful interventions during the neonatal period can cause irreversible changes in the developing brain and can negatively impact development [1]. Neonatal intensive care leads to decreased parental interactions and impacts parentneonate bonding, which can lead to poor neurodevelopmental outcomes [3]. Both pain and bonding issues can be addressed by providing pain control by skin-to-skin care by parents. Assessment of pain in preterm neonates is challenging [4]; premature infant pain profile (PIPP) is the most widely validated tool for pain assessment. Several pain control interventions are effective for preterm neonatal pain control [5], but SSC is one of the most preferred and widely studied pain control interventions because it confers several benefits in addition to pain control to both parents and neonates [6]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call