Abstract

Although skin blood flow is an important determinant of amputation site healing, most techniques to evaluate it are cumbersome and indirect. We have prospectively compared a new, simple and direct technique, skin fluorescence (SF), with a more established indirect method, segmental limb blood pressures (BP), to determine the value of each in predicting amputation healing of an ischemic extremity. Twenty-six consecutive patients with ischemic tissue loss were studied prior to amputation. Thigh, calf, and ankle BP were measured; then SF was determined by injecting 10–15 mg/kg of fluorescein intravenously and examining the limb with uv light. BP of > 50 mm Hg was considered adequate for amputation wound healing; yellow SF indicated adequate skin blood flow. In each case, the most distal site predicted to heal by either method was selected for amputation. Thirty amputations were performed (6 digital, 3 transmetatarsal, 11 below knee, and 10 above knee) with an 80% healing rate. When SF and BP disagreed on the level of amputation, fluorescein always predicted a more distal site. SF accurately predicted amputation healing in 80% of cases. In the remaining 20%, amputation failures were due to infection in two and deep tissue necrosis in four. BP was accurate and useful in 47% of cases. In 14 patients BP indicated the need for a higher level of amputation than was successfully performed. In two patients BP measurement was indeterminate due to “stiff arteries.” Furthermore, in two patients amputations failed despite BP > 50 mm Hg. We conclude that SF helps the surgeon select a more distal level of amputation than segmental limb pressures, and one that has a high likelihood of healing.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.