Abstract
Because our sensitivity to human skin color leads to a precise chromatic adjustment, skin color has been considered a calibration target to enhance the quality of images that contain human faces. In this paper, we investigated the perceived quality of portrait images depending on how the target skin color is defined: measured, memory, digital, or CCT skin color variations. A user study was conducted; 24 participants assessed the quality of white-balanced portraits on five criteria: reality, naturalness, appropriateness, preference, and emotional enhancement. The results showed that the calibration using measured skin color best served the aspects of reality and naturalness. With regard to appropriateness and preference, digital skin color obtained the highest score. Also, the memory skin color was appropriate to calibrate portraits with emotional enhancement. In addition, the other two CCT target colors enhanced the affective quality of portrait images, but the effect was quite marginal. In the foregoing, labelled Skin Balance, this study proposes a set of alternative targets for skin color, a simple but efficient way of reproducing portrait images with affective enhancement.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
