Abstract

The aim was to compare the anthropometrics, biomechanics and energetics in young swimmers of different competitive levels. Seventy-five boys aged between 11 and 13 years-old with a broad range of performances were ranked based on their personal best time in the men’s 100m freestyle event and then split-up into three tiers (Tier-1, i.e., top-tier, best performers; Tier-2, mid-tier; Tier-3, lower-tier). A set of anthropometric features was measured (height, body mass, arm span and trunk transverse surface area). Stroke kinematics (speed, stroke length, stroke frequency) was assessed by a Speedo-meter. Swim efficiency was then estimated (stroke index, speed fluctuation, Froude efficiency). Hydrodynamics assessment encompassed the estimation of active drag and drag coefficient by velocity perturbation method and a set of dimensionless numbers (Froude, hull speed, Reynolds). Mechanical power (to overcome drag, transfer of kinetic energy to water, external power) and power input were derived. There was a significant variation with moderate effect sizes in all anthropometric features but the trunk transverse surface area. Tier-1 swimmers were taller, heavier and with longer limbs than remaining counterparts. There were also significant variations in the stroke kinematics with moderate-large effect sizes. Tier-1 swimmers showed higher stroke frequency, stroke length, speed, stroke index and propelling efficiency but lower speed fluctuations. Reynold number, Froude number and hull speed were significantly higher in Tier-1 swimmers, denoting large effect sizes. The mechanical power and power input delivered were significantly higher in tier-1 swimmers, showing moderate effect sizes. As a conclusion, it was noted significant variations, with moderate-large effect sizes, among the three tiers, for the vast majority of the selected variables. The better performances by tier-1 swimmers were related to their anthropometrics, biomechanics and energetics.

Highlights

  • In endurance sports, notably time-based events, the athlete aims to travel a given distance as quick as possible

  • The speed depends on energetics and biomechanics: v = Etot

  • Aerobic energy release is straightforward to be measured because there is a relationship between oxygen uptake measured by breathing and the whole-body aerobic production of ATP; while, methods to measure anaerobic sources are less reliable as anaerobic ATP production takes place at intracellular level, with little reliance on central processes (Gastin, 2001)

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Notably time-based events, the athlete aims to travel a given distance as quick as possible. Where Etot is the total power input, Eaer the energy contribution by aerobic system, Eanaer−la by the anaerobic lactic system, and E ATP−PCr by the anaerobic alactic system. The 200 m event, the aerobic contribution has been reported as 60–65% (Capelli et al, 1998; Figueiredo et al, 2011) In all these researches anaerobic lactic contribution was estimated by blood measures and anaerobic alactic contribution by an analytical model. In a swimming event that takes just under 1 min (e.g., 100 m) the aerobic contribution to total energy expenditure is 30–45%, depending on the measuring techniques used. In order to deliver better performances, swimmers can either enhance Etot (energetics) and/or C (biomechanics). The aim was to compare the anthropometrics, biomechanics and energetics in young swimmers of different competitive levels. It was hypothesized that top-tier swimmers would have beneficial anthropometric traits, better biomechanical and energetics responses than low-tier counterparts

Participants
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
ETHICS STATEMENT
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.