Abstract

AbstractThere are two major challenges to improving interannual to decadal forecasts: (a) consistently initializing the coupled system so that variability is not dominated by initial imbalances, and (b) having a large sample of different initial conditions on which to test forecast skill. The second challenge requires consideration of time periods not only outside the recent period of intensive ocean observation, but also before the instrumental era, which increases the importance of the first challenge. Forecasts prior to the 1850s isolate internally generated sources of variability by removing the majority of anthropogenic forcing, and the sparse observational record during this time period motivates the use of paleoclimate proxy data. We address these issues by using a linear inverse model (LIM) approach and a recent proxy‐based reconstruction over the last millennium at annual resolution. The reconstruction is used to train, initialize, and validate LIM forecasts. The LIM trained on paleo‐data assimilated using a LIM trained on global climate model (GCM) simulation data outperforms a LIM trained on raw GCM data at forecast leads longer than 2 years for in‐sample experiments, and beyond 4‐year leads in most out‐of‐sample experiments validated on instrumental data. The most skillful normal mode of the paleo‐data LIM for the instrumental experiment represents a persistent pattern with a longer decay time than for the GCM‐LIM's modes, which accounts for the outperformance at longer leads. The paleo‐data LIM is consequently more sensitive to ocean initialization, which is reflected in forecasts during the instrumental era where ocean reanalyses exhibit large uncertainty.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call