Abstract

The value placed on success in achievement situations by internals and congruent (CE) and defensive (DE) externals was investigated in tasks defined as either skill-or chance-determined. Internals and DEs persisted longer on the skill task than CDs, while both external groups worked longer on the chance task than internals. Across task conditions, internaLs and DEs persisted longer in the skill than chance task, while CEs did not dffer. These results support the utility of the CE-DE distinction, and suggest that DEs behave similarly to internals in skill-based achievement situations, while externality for CEs is more representative of a veridical set of external control beliefs.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.