Abstract
Professional skepticism is an attitude includes a questioning mind and a critical assessment of audit evidence. Auditors should maintain a certain level of professional skepticism in detecting financial statement fraud since the perpetrators conceal the resulting irregularities. Two experiments were conducted. First, a 3x3 between subjects experiment design was conducted to investigate how fraud risk assessment affect the level of professional skepticism on the different level of trust in auditor-client relationship. Participants were randomly assigned to one of nine condition. Second, a within subject experiment design was conducted to examines the effect of personality type on professional skepticism. A total of] 18 junior, senior and supervisor auditors from public accounting firm participated in the experiment. A total of 8 participants were discarded because they failed the manipulation check. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for data analysis. The results suggest that auditors with identification based trust in the high fraud risk assessment group were more skeptical than in the low fraud risk assessment group. While the auditors with calculus based trust showed no differences in skepticism between the high group and the low fraud risk assessment group. Auditors with ST (Sensing-Thinking) and NT (Intuitive-Thinking) types of personality more skeptical than other types. Keywords: Professional Skepticism, Trust, Fraud Risk Assessment
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
