Skeletal microstructure of uintacrinoid crinoids and inferences about their mode of life

Abstract

Uintacrinoids (Uintacrinoidea) are among the most bizarre of all the crinoids. These stratigraphically important Late Cretaceous crinoids are characterized by an atypical large stalkless globular cup without cirriferous centrodorsal and extremely long arms. Owing to this unusual morphology, the mode of life of these crinoids has confused palaeontologists for more than a century. While uintacrinoids have been commonly regarded as pelagic forms, either swimming actively or floating passively by means of a putative buoyancy mechanism, some recent authors have favoured a benthic mode of life. However, evidence supporting a benthic lifestyle hypothesis is still limited. Here we describe the stereom microstructure of Marsupites and Uintacrinus. In Marsupites, thecal plates are typically comprised of coarse to medium, clearly structural, galleried stereom, which alternates with zones of fine and deeply penetrating galleried stereom oriented perpendicular to the plate margins. The latter stereom type corresponds to the external ribbed ornament of the theca, and is indicative of collagenous sutural fibers for binding adjacent plates. In Uintacrinus, thecal plates are almost entirely composed of fine galleried stereom diagnostic for collagenous sutural fibers. In both taxa, a perforate stereom layer, that is known to increase plate strengthening and resistance to abrasion in some Recent echinoderms, is developed most externally, and also produces a characteristic interior growth banding pattern. No skeletal adaptations for maintaining buoyancy, such as skeletal lightening and hollow architecture, that are known to occur in nektonic and pseudoplanktonic crinoids, are observed. Instead, the stereom organization in uintacrinoids closely resembles those observed in Recent benthic crinoids. Our findings thus strongly support a benthic mode of life of uintacrinoids. Their widespread distribution within a short time interval can be best explained by having a very long-term planktonic larval stage as previously hypothesized by some authors.