Abstract

The amount of resources invested in reproduction is closely correlated to plant size. However, the increase in reproductive investment is not always proportional to the increase in vegetative growth, as the proportion of plant resources allocated to reproduction can increase, decrease or be maintained along different plant sizes. Although comprising thousand of species, epiphytes are poorly studied in relation to reproductive allocation (RA). We describe the variation in the RA of the epiphytic bromeliad Tillandsia stricta Soland with increasing plant sizes. Our goal is not only to evaluate the RA of the whole inflorescence but also quantify the contribution of ancillary structures in the final RA of this plant species. With increasing sizes of T. stricta the reproductive allocation of biomass to the whole inflorescence decreased significantly along plant sizes from 37% to 12%. Reproductive allocation to ancillary and to flowers decreased respectively from 30% to 9% and 10% to 3%. As leaves are the main source of water and nutrients absorption in atmospheric Tillandsia, the total leaf area and area per leaf were used as indicators of foraging capacity, that also increased with plant size. We discuss these results with respect to the capacity of T. stricta to reproduce in the heterogeneous environment of the canopies.

Highlights

  • Reproductive allocation (RA) is defined as the proportion of resources invested in reproductive organs such as inflorescence, fruits or seeds (Abrahamson & Caswell 1982; Bazzaz et al 1987)

  • As the functions of defense, growth and storage compete with reproduction for resources (Bazzaz et al 1987), reproductive allocation (RA) is influenced by stronger functional demands for defense and/or vegetative growth according to the environment

  • Reproductive investment increased with increase in plant size (Fig. 1-6)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reproductive allocation (RA) is defined as the proportion of resources (energy, biomass and nutrients) invested in reproductive organs such as inflorescence, fruits or seeds (Abrahamson & Caswell 1982; Bazzaz et al 1987). The increase in reproductive investment is not always proportional to the increase in vegetative growth. The proportion of plant resources allocated to reproduction can increase, decrease or be maintained along increasing plant sizes (Bazzaz et al 1987). As the functions of defense, growth and storage compete with reproduction for resources (Bazzaz et al 1987), RA is influenced by stronger functional demands for defense and/or vegetative growth according to the environment.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.