Abstract

Knowledge about how parasites choose their hosts is scarce and incomplete. Recent work has primarily focused on host health (i.e. immunocompetence) whereas ecological factors have been largely neglected. Here we investigate whether the immunocompetence, the nutritional condition or body size of nestling European bee-eaters Merops apiaster are used as parameters for habitat choice of the haematophagous fly Carnus hemapterus. We found that (i) flies consistently and nonrandomly preferred larger nestlings, even after controlling for differences in habitat availability (host surface), (ii) in the presence of similar-sized hosts, parasites' choice for an individual was less likely than if hosts differed in size, (iii) the more the hosts differed in size, the more the parasites aggregated on the larger nestling and (iv) parasites changed their preference according to size criteria regardless of the identity of the larger host. Neither immunocompetence nor host body condition could account for parasites' preference. Our results do not support the prediction of the Tasty Chick Hypothesis, namely that the poor immunocompetence ability of junior chicks makes them more attractive to parasites. We conclude that basic ecological factors (e.g. body size) can be essential for parasites when choosing a host.

Highlights

  • Studies of avian host–parasite interactions have mainly focused on how parasites influence host fitness and behaviour (Møller, Allander & Dafva, 1990 ; Loye & Zuk, 1991 ; Møller, 1997)

  • Recent work on the criteria used by parasites to choose hosts has focused on host health whereas ecological factors influencing habitat choice by parasites have been largely neglected

  • We examine whether the immunocompetence, the nutritional condition or body size of the host is used for habitat choice by the haematophagous fly Carnus hemapterus (Nitzsch 1818, Diptera : Carnidae), an ectoparasite of European bee-eaters (Merops apiaster)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Studies of avian host–parasite interactions have mainly focused on how parasites influence host fitness and behaviour (Møller, Allander & Dafva, 1990 ; Loye & Zuk, 1991 ; Møller, 1997). In contrast to the TCH, other studies suggest that aggregated distribution of parasites within broods reflects parasites’ preference for larger hosts or individuals in good condition since these host types might be a better food source than smaller hosts or individuals in weak condition (Lee & Clayton, 1995 ; Darolova, Hoi & Schleicher, 1997 ; Dawson & Bortolotti, 1997). This hypothesis predicts that parasites prefer the fittest chick in a brood (which is usually the oldest and biggest one). Morphology, life-history and ecological requirements of parasites can play a critical role in the determination of host preference

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call