Abstract

The purpose of this study is to retrospectively evaluate size-specific dose estimates of a renal-colic CT protocol and to assess the quality and diagnostic value of obtained images. The study population included 82 consecutive adult patients with acute renal colic undergoing CT with a reduced radiation dose (noise index, 59.1). The control group included 82 consecutive patients who underwent clinically indicated CT examination of the abdomen and pelvis with a routine-dose CT protocol (noise index, 22.0). The size-specific dose estimate was calculated with volume CT dose index and patient effective diameter. Subjective image quality analysis was based on visibility of the ureter. Ureters were tracked from the renal pelvis to the vesicoureteral junction. Objective image quality was based on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The size-specific dose estimates in the renal-colic group were 2.7 times lower than those in the control group. A linear relationship between patient size and size-specific dose estimate was noted. In the smallest patient, the conversion factor for the size-specific dose estimate calculation was 1.65. Overall image quality was better for the control patients, but there was no statistically significant difference in ureter visibility. The SNR was higher for the control group, whereas no difference in CNR was found. Small patients need the biggest correction for body size and require special attention in radiation dose estimation. We suggest the modification of scanning parameters on the basis of size-specific dose estimate to decrease patient dose in large patients.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.