Size of the Canadian Breeding Population of Monarch Butterflies Is Driven by Factors Acting During Spring Migration and Recolonization

Tara L Crewe,Maxim Larrivée,Greg W Mitchell

doi:10.3389/fevo.2019.00308

Abstract

The eastern North American monarch butterfly population shows a long-term population decline. While it is hypothesized that forest loss on the wintering grounds and milkweed loss throughout the breeding range are responsible for the observed decline, there is much less certainty regarding the factors driving year-to-year variation around the current population level. Using 15 years of butterfly count data, we used a community-based approach to delineate the stage of the annual cycle during which population limiting factors are most strongly acting. We compared annual fluctuations in size of the breeding population of monarch butterflies in Canada to fluctuations in 13 additional butterfly species which either migrate long distances to Canada or are resident but breed in similar habitats to the monarch. We show that the breeding population of monarchs in southern Canada shows a higher degree of synchrony with other long-distance migrants than with breeding residents, and that annual fluctuations of all migrant butterflies show a positive correlation with the number of 21 ˚C days during spring migration and re-colonization. Further, we found that size of the monarch breeding population shows a higher degree of synchrony with the size of the following winter population than with the size of the previous winter population. Combined, our results suggest that the monarch population in Canada is limited by factors acting during spring migration, and that weather plays an important role in the ability of the monarch to successfully re-colonize and breed in the northern portion of their summer range each year. A predicted increase in temperature in the early spring, combined with continued loss of breeding and wintering habitat, has the potential to limit the reproductive capacity of monarchs and their ability to recover from population lows.

Highlights

Monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) populations are declining throughout their eastern range, during all phases of the annual cycle, and its migration is considered by some to be an endangered biological phenomenonCanadian Monarch Breeding Population (Brower et al, 2012)
We show that weak correspondence between the size of the overwintering population and subsequent breeding population, along with stronger temporal population synchrony among migrants than among resident butterflies, supports the hypothesis that monarchs breeding in Canada are most strongly limited by factors acting during spring migration and recolonization given contemporary levels of milkweed availability in the US
The lack of synchrony between annual numbers of monarchs and resident co-occurring butterfly species suggests that the size of the monarch breeding population is not driven by factors acting during the breeding season, such as direct and indirect effects of weather

Summary

Introduction

Monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) populations are declining throughout their eastern range, during all phases of the annual cycle (fall migration: Crewe and McCracken, 2015, but see Badgett and Davis, 2015; over-wintering: Thogmartin et al, 2017a; breeding: Pleasants and Oberhauser, 2013), and its migration is considered by some to be an endangered biological phenomenonCanadian Monarch Breeding Population (Brower et al, 2012). Badgett and Davis (2015), Ries et al (2015), and Inamine et al (2016) suggested a lack of correlation between fall population indices in the US and population size on the wintering grounds is evidence that limiting factors are occurring during fall migration. Given these competing, yet not mutually exclusive hypotheses, there is a need to better understand when, and where limiting factors are occurring in the annual cycle of the monarch butterfly. Conditions during fall migration such as nectar availability and suitable weather conditions for migration may influence migration success and the ability of monarchs to reach the wintering grounds (Badgett and Davis, 2015; Ries et al, 2015, and Inamine et al, 2016), potentially affecting Canada’s overall contribution to the winter population

Methods

Results

Conclusion