Size of Firm, Market Structure, and Innovation

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessSize of Firm, Market Structure, and InnovationEdwin MansfieldEdwin Mansfield Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 71, Number 6Dec., 1963 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/258815 Views: 29Total views on this site Citations: 112Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1963 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Jianjun Ge, Donghui Li, Yingzhao Ni, Shijie Yang Inflexibility and corporate innovation: Cross-country evidence, Journal of Multinational Financial Management 64 (Jun 2022): 100736.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2022.100736Beniamino Callegari, Erlend Nybakk Schumpeterian theory and research on forestry innovation and entrepreneurship: The state of the art, issues and an agenda, Forest Policy and Economics 138 (May 2022): 102720.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102720Hua Tang The Effect of ESG Performance on Corporate Innovation in China: The Mediating Role of Financial Constraints and Agency Cost, Sustainability 14, no.77 (Mar 2022): 3769.https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073769RICHA SHUKLA R&D SPILLOVER, FIRM SIZE AND IN-HOUSE R&D: PANEL DATA EVIDENCE FROM ELECTRONICS GOODS SECTOR IN INDIA, The Singapore Economic Review 78 (Sep 2021): 1–41.https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590821500508Sukhdeep Singh, Indrani Chakraborty Growth of the Firms and Investments in Innovations: An Empirical Investigation of the Indian Manufacturing Industry, Journal of Quantitative Economics 19, no.11 (Sep 2020): 87–122.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-020-00218-8Tobias Buchmann, Patrick Wolf, Stefan Fidaschek Stimulating E-Mobility Diffusion in Germany (EMOSIM): An Agent-Based Simulation Approach, Energies 14, no.33 (Jan 2021): 656.https://doi.org/10.3390/en14030656Phillip E. Davis, Joshua S. Bendickson Strategic antecedents of innovation: Variance between small and large firms, Journal of Small Business Management 59, no.11 (Jan 2020): 47–72.https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12478Mehmet Eymen Eryılmaz, Olcay Bektaş An Examination of the Relationship Between Vision Content and Amount of Innovation in SMEs, (Jan 2021): 497–521.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9155-0.ch025Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, Min Zhang The cost of weak institutions for innovation in China, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 153 (Apr 2020): 119937.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119937Richa Shukla Market Structure, Entry Barriers, and Firms’ R&D Intensity: Panel Data Evidence from Electronics Goods Sector in India, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 20, no.11 (Jul 2019): 115–137.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-019-00308-1Florian J. Zach, Juan L. Nicolau, Abhinav Sharma Disruptive innovation, innovation adoption and incumbent market value: The case of Airbnb, Annals of Tourism Research 80 (Jan 2020): 102818.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2019.102818Tobias Stucki, Martin Woerter Competitive Pressure and Diversification into Green R&D, Review of Industrial Organization 55, no.22 (Aug 2018): 301–325.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-018-9656-6Ching T Liao Laggards imitate, leaders innovate: the heterogeneous productivity effect of imitation versus innovation, Industrial and Corporate Change 4 (Jul 2019).https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtz043Martin Prause, Jürgen Weigand The Shape of Things to Come, (Oct 2019): 99–119.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25237-3_12Jian Xu, Jae-Woo Sim Characteristics of Corporate R&D Investment in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Manufacturing Industry in China and South Korea, Sustainability 10, no.99 (Aug 2018): 3002.https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093002Richa Shukla Impact of R&D Spillovers on Firm-Level R&D Intensity: Panel Data Evidence from Electronics Goods Sector in India, (Sep 2017): 203–225.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5424-2_9Mehmet Eymen Eryılmaz, Olcay Bektaş An Examination of the Relationship Between Vision Content and Amount of Innovation in SMEs, (Jan 2018): 20–44.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3525-6.ch002Christian Le Bas L’innovation soutenable : un enrichissement des études sur l’innovation, Revue d'économie industrielle , no.159159 (Sep 2017): 9–20.https://doi.org/10.4000/rei.6585Marek Vokoun Characteristics of the innovation activities of firms in Europe: a critical review of international differences, Review of Economic Perspectives 17, no.33 (Sep 2017): 239–262.https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2017-0013Pilar Beneito, María Engracia Rochina-Barrachina, Amparo Sanchis Competition and innovation with selective exit: an inverted-U shape relationship?, Oxford Economic Papers (Feb 2017).https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpw080Roberto Camagni Spatial Diffusion of Pervasive Process Innovation, (Oct 2017): 49–63.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57807-1_3Jiwat Ram, Siqi Liu, Andy Koronois The Role of Social Media in Innovation and Creativity: The Case of Chinese Social Media, (Jun 2016): 381–390.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40973-3_38JÖrn Kleinert, Julien Martin, Farid Toubal The Few Leading the Many: Foreign Affiliates and Business Cycle Comovement, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 7, no.44 (Oct 2015): 134–159.https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20130234Mehmet Eymen Eryılmaz, Olcay Bektaş Can an Innovation Oriented Vision Statement Really Trigger Innovation in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises?, (Jan 2015): 352–364.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8216-0.ch017Michael Peneder, Martin Woerter Competition, R&D and innovation: testing the inverted-U in a simultaneous system, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 24, no.33 (May 2013): 653–687.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-013-0310-zWei Jin, ZhongXiang Zhang Explaining the Slow Pace of Energy Technological Innovation: Why Market Conditions Matter?, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2403722Federico Rajola IT is Business: Some Emerging Reflections and IT Governance of CRM Projects, (Jan 2013): 9–25.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35554-7_2Michael R. Peneder, Martin Woerter Competition, R&D and Innovation: Testing the Inverted-U in a Simultaneous System, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2284188Xiang Ying Mei, Charles Arcodia, Lisa Ruhanen Towards tourism innovation: A critical review of public polices at the national level, Tourism Management Perspectives 4 (Oct 2012): 92–105.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2012.05.002Florian Zach Partners and Innovation in American Destination Marketing Organizations, Journal of Travel Research 51, no.44 (Dec 2011): 412–425.https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287511426340Rohit Azad A STEINDLIAN MODEL OF CONCENTRATION, DEBT AND GROWTH, Metroeconomica 63, no.22 (Sep 2011): 295–334.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-999X.2011.04138.xRaymond De Bondt, Jan Vandekerckhove Reflections on the Relation Between Competition and Innovation, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 12, no.11 (Jul 2010): 7–19.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-010-0084-zSumit K. Majumdar Legal Regime Change and Innovation: Foreign Exchange Regulations and Pharmaceutical Sector R&D in India, (Mar 2015): 75–103.https://doi.org/10.1108/S0193-5895(2012)0000025008Peter Witt, Gerald Schönbucher Unternehmerische Orientierung und Wettbewerbsfähigkeit, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 81, no.S4S4 (Jun 2011): 125–151.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-011-0473-8Sumit K. Majumdar Retentions, relations and innovation: the financing of R&D in India, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 20, no.33 (Apr 2011): 233–257.https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590903516335Sumit K. Majumdar Scalability versus flexibility: firm size and R&D in Indian industry, The Journal of Technology Transfer 36, no.11 (Dec 2009): 101–116.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9147-xDeborah M. Weiss Entrepreneurial Employees, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1868646Markos Zachariadis Diffusion and Use of Financial Telecommunication: An Empirical Analysis of SWIFT Adoption, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1952843Kostas Karantininis, Johannes Sauer, William Hartley Furtan Innovation and integration in the agri-food industry, Food Policy 35, no.22 (Apr 2010): 112–120.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2009.10.003Kuo-Pin Yang, Yu-Ching Chiao, Chih-Chung Kuo The Relationship Between R&D Investment and Firm Profitability Under a Three-Stage Sigmoid Curve Model: Evidence From an Emerging Economy, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 57, no.11 (Feb 2010): 103–117.https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2009.2023452Corianne P. Scally State Housing Finance Agencies Forty Years Later, Journal of Planning Education and Research 29, no.22 (Dec 2009): 194–212.https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X09348614Anahita Baregheh, Jennifer Rowley, Sally Sambrook Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation, Management Decision 47, no.88 (Sep 2009): 1323–1339.https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910984578Mei-Ling Yang, Andrew Ming-Long Wang, Kuo-Chih Cheng The impact of quality of IS information and budget slack on innovation performance, Technovation 29, no.88 (Aug 2009): 527–536.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.01.004K. Narayanan, Savita Bhat Technology sourcing and its determinants: A study of Basic Chemical industry in India, Technovation 29, no.88 (Aug 2009): 562–573.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.01.005Savita Bhat, K. Narayanan Technological Strategies and Firm Characteristics: A Study of Indian Basic Chemical Industry, (Jan 2009): 169–187.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78695-7_11Carole A Estabrooks, Linda Derksen, Connie Winther, John N Lavis, Shannon D Scott, Lars Wallin, Joanne Profetto-McGrath The intellectual structure and substance of the knowledge utilization field: A longitudinal author co-citation analysis, 1945 to 2004, Implementation Science 3, no.11 (Nov 2008).https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-3-49Leon Oerlemans, Marthinus Pretorius On the relationship between organizational slack and the level of innovation of firms, (Jul 2008): 664–671.https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2008.4599675Joshua M. Franzel Urban Government Innovation: Identifying Current Innovations and Factors that Contribute to Their Adoption, Review of Policy Research 25, no.33 (May 2008): 253–277.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00326.xChialin Chang, Stéphane Robin Doing R&D and/or Importing Technologies: The Critical Importance of Firm Size in Taiwan’s Manufacturing Industries, Review of Industrial Organization 29, no.33 (Oct 2006): 253–278.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-006-9114-8D. Pontikakis, Y. Lin, D. Demirbas History matters in Greece: The adoption of Internet-enabled computers by small and medium sized enterprises, Information Economics and Policy 18, no.33 (Sep 2006): 332–358.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2006.03.004F. Woo, R. Mikusauskas, D. Bartlett, R. Law Is OO the Systems Development Technology for Your Organization?, (Jan 2006): 354–363.https://doi.org/10.1109/SERA.2006.44George Bitros Scale, Scope and Entrepreneurship, (Jan 2005): 61–76.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522633_3William P. Barnett, David G. McKendrick Why are Some Organizations More Competitive than Others? Evidence from a Changing Global Market, Administrative Science Quarterly 49, no.44 (Jun 2016): 535–571.https://doi.org/10.2307/4131490Georgios (George) C. Bitros Scale, Scope and Entrepreneurship, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2004).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.664344Paroma Sanyal Understanding patents: The role Of R&D funding sources and the patent office, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 12, no.66 (Dec 2003): 507–529.https://doi.org/10.1080/714933760Arthur M Diamond Edwin Mansfield’s contributions to the economics of technology, Research Policy 32, no.99 (Oct 2003): 1607–1617.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00056-8Laura Bradley, Kate Stewart A Delphi study of Internet banking, Marketing Intelligence & Planning 21, no.55 (Sep 2003): 272–281.https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500310490229Vangelis Souitaris Determinants of Technological Innovation: Current Research Trends and Future Prospects, (Jan 2003): 513–528.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044198-6/50035-8Laura Bradley, Kate Stewart A Delphi study of the drivers and inhibitors of Internet banking, International Journal of Bank Marketing 20, no.66 (Nov 2002): 250–260.https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320210446715David M. Hart Antitrust and technological innovation in the US: ideas, institutions, decisions, and impacts, 1890–2000, Research Policy 30, no.66 (Jun 2001): 923–936.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00165-7Bruce A McDaniel A survey on entrepreneurship and innovation, The Social Science Journal 37, no.22 (Apr 2000): 277–284.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-3319(00)00060-4VANGELIS SOUITARIS RESEARCH ON THE DETERMINANTS OF TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION: A CONTINGENCY APPROACH, International Journal of Innovation Management 03, no.0303 (Sep 1999): 287–305.https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919699000153Christopher Weare, Juliet A. Musso, Matthew L. Hale Electronic Democracy and the Diffusion of Municipal Web Pages in California, Administration & Society 31, no.11 (Jul 2016): 3–27.https://doi.org/10.1177/009539999400935475Nitin Nohria, Ranjay Gulati What is the optimum amount of organizational slack?, European Management Journal 15, no.66 (Dec 1997): 603–611.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(97)00044-3Myung Jae Moon, Stuart Bretschneider Can state government actions affect innovation and its diffusion?: An extended communication model and empirical test, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54, no.11 (Jan 1997): 57–77.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00121-7G.F. MEINTJES, C.W.I. PISTORIUS Market Structure and Technological Innovation, The South African Journal of Economics 64, no.44 (Dec 1996): 242–251.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1813-6982.1996.tb01346.xNitin Nohria, Ranjay Gulati Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation?, Academy of Management Journal 39, no.55 (Oct 1996): 1245–1264.https://doi.org/10.5465/256998Atul A. Nerkar, Rita Gunther McGrath, Ian C. MacMillan Three facets of satisfaction and their influence on the performance of innovation teams, Journal of Business Venturing 11, no.33 (May 1996): 167–188.https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(96)00002-XJacky A. Swan, Sue Newell The Role of Professional Associations in Technology Diffusion, Organization Studies 16, no.55 (Sep 1995): 847–874.https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069501600505William S. Comanor, F.M. Scherer Rewriting History: the Early Sherman Act Monopolization Cases, International Journal of the Economics of Business 2, no.22 (Jul 1995): 263–290.https://doi.org/10.1080/758519313Jeffrey L. Brudney, Sally Coleman Selden The Adoption of Innovation by Smaller Local Governments: The Case of Computer Technology, The American Review of Public Administration 25, no.11 (Jul 2016): 71–86.https://doi.org/10.1177/027507409502500105Briance Mascarenhas, Jun Y. Park The sources of invention and their market consequences, Strategic Change 3, no.55 (Sep 1994): 261–275.https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.4240030504John M. Stopford, Charles W. F. Baden-Fuller Creating corporate entrepreneurship, Strategic Management Journal 15, no.77 (Sep 1994): 521–536.https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150703Kiyohiko Ito, Vladimir Pucik R&D spending, domestic competition, and export performance of Japanese manufacturing firms, Strategic Management Journal 14, no.11 (Nov 2006): 61–75.https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140107Bart Nooteboom Adoption, Firm Size And Risk Of Implementation, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 2, no.33 (Jan 1993): 203–216.https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599300000003Janet T. Knoedler Market Structure, Industrial Research, and Consumers of Innovation: Forging Backward Linkages to Research in the Turn-of-the-Century U.S. Steel Industry, Business History Review 67, no.11 (Dec 2011): 98–139.https://doi.org/10.2307/3117469Stephen R. Pratt, David L. Rogers ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY INNOVATION RE-EXAMINED, Community Development Society. Journal 23, no.11 (Sep 1992): 39–56.https://doi.org/10.1080/15575339209489939F. M. Scherer Antitrust: Ideology or economics?, Critical Review 5, no.44 (Mar 2008): 497–511.https://doi.org/10.1080/08913819108443239Chol Lee Determinants of National Innovativeness and International Market Segmentation, International Marketing Review 7, no.55 (May 1990).https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000001534Kazimierz Z. Poznanski Diffusion performance of major steel-making countries: alternative econometric tests, Economics of Planning 23, no.22 (Jan 1990): 129–141.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00312931Kathleen Carley Structural constraints on communication: The diffusion of the homomorphic signal analysis technique through scientific fields, The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 15, no.3-43-4 (Jan 1990): 207–246.https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1990.9990070Wesley M. Cohen, Richard C. Levin Chapter 18 Empirical studies of innovation and market structure, (Jan 1989): 1059–1107.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-448X(89)02006-6Jitendra V. Singh Performance, Slack, and Risk Taking in Organizational Decision Making, Academy of Management Journal 29, no.33 (Sep 1986): 562–585.https://doi.org/10.5465/256224Roberto P. Camagni Spatial diffusion of pervasive process innovation, Papers of the Regional Science Association 58, no.11 (Dec 1985): 83–95.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01935256Sillrley S. Yu Some determinants of entry into the rapeutic drug markets, Review of Industrial Organization 1, no.44 (Dec 1984): 260–275.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354126Donna J. Wood The Adoption of Academic Women's Studies Programs, Knowledge 5, no.44 (Aug 2016): 509–536.https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708400500405Rowland T. Moriarty, Robert E. Spekman An Empirical Investigation of the Information Sources used during the Industrial Buying Process, Journal of Marketing Research 21, no.22 (Dec 2018): 137–147.https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378402100202David C. Mowery Industrial Research and Firm Size, Survival, and Growth in American Manufacturing, 1921–1946: An Assessment, The Journal of Economic History 43, no.44 (Mar 2009): 953–980.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700030837P. D. Loeb Further evidence of the determinants of industrial research and development using single and simultaneous equation models, Empirical Economics 8, no.3-43-4 (Sep 1983): 203–214.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01969344David Marple Technological Innovation and Organizational Survival: A Population Ecology Study of Nineteenth-Century American Railroads, The Sociological Quarterly 23, no.11 (Dec 2016): 107–116.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1982.tb02223.xDaniel Levinthal, James G. March A model of adaptive organizational search, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 2, no.44 (Dec 1981): 307–333.https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(81)90012-3David Marple Technological Innovation and Organizational Survival: A Population Ecology Study of Nineteenth-Century American Railroads*, The Sociological Quarterly 23, no.11 (Dec 1981): 107–116.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1981.tb01950.xJoseph M. Jadlow New evidence on innovation and market structure, Managerial and Decision Economics 2, no.22 (Jan 2012): 91–96.https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090020205Michael Aiken, Samuel B. Bacharach, J. Lawrence French Organizational Structure, Work Process, and Proposal Making in Administrative Bureaucracies, Academy of Management Journal 23, no.44 (Dec 1980): 631–652.https://doi.org/10.5465/255553Michael J. Baker, Roy Rothwell Industrial Buying Behaviour and the Adoption of Innovations, (Jan 1979): 345–368.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03822-0_18Peter D Linneman An econometric examination of the English parliamentary enclosure movement, Explorations in Economic History 15, no.22 (Apr 1978): 221–228.https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4983(78)90023-2Joseph G. Paolillo, Warren B. Brown How Organizational Factors Affect R&D Innovation, Research Management 21, no.22 (Sep 2016): 12–15.https://doi.org/10.1080/00345334.1978.11756463Jon L. Pierce, André L. Delbecq Organization Structure, Individual Attitudes and Innovation, Academy of Management Review 2, no.11 (Jan 1977): 27–37.https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1977.4409154A. J. Buxton The process of technical change in UK manufacturing, Applied Economics 7, no.11 (May 2006): 53–71.https://doi.org/10.1080/00036847500000007DAVID A. HUETTNER THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONTINUOUS CASTING IN THE U. S. STEEL INDUSTRY: COMMENT, Economic Inquiry 12, no.22 (Jun 1974): 265–270.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1974.tb00245.xDAVID AULT THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONTINUOUS CASTING IN THE U. S. STEEL INDUSTRY: REPLY, Economic Inquiry 12, no.22 (Jun 1974): 271–277.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1974.tb00246.xB. Naslund, B. Sellstedt Budgets for research and development: an empirical study of 69 Swedish firms, R&D Management 4, no.22 (Feb 1974): 67–73.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1974.tb01056.xB. Naslund, B. Sellstedt Budgets for research and development: an empirical study of 69 Swedish firms, R&D Management 4, no.11 (Oct 1973): 67–73.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1973.tb01036.xMichael P. Peters, M. Venkatesan Exploration of Variables Inherent in Adopting an Industrial Product, Journal of Marketing Research 10, no.33 (Dec 2018): 312–315.https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377301000314Charles Kennedy, A. P. Thirlwall Technical Progress, (Jan 1973): 115–176.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01860-4_3D. J. Smyth, J. M. Samuels, J. Tzoannos Patents, profitability, liquidity and firm size, Applied Economics 4, no.22 (Jul 2006): 77–86.https://doi.org/10.1080/00036847200000037O. E. Williamson Economies as an Anti-Trust Defense: The Welfare Tradeoffs, (Jan 1972): 111–135.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15486-9_7F. Webster Communication and diffusion processes in industrial markets, European Journal of Marketing 5, no.44 (Apr 1971): 178–188.https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005171Michael Aiken, Jerald Hage The Organic Organization and Innovation, Sociology 5, no.11 (Jan 1971): 63–82.https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857100500105Frederick E. Webster On the Applicability of Communication Theory to Industrial Markets, Journal of Marketing Research 5, no.44 (Nov 2018): 426–428.https://doi.org/10.1177/002224376800500411W. P. Hogan BRITISH MANUFACTURING SUBSIDIARIES IN AUSTRALIA AND EXPORT FRANCHISES, Economic Papers: A journal of applied economics and policy E1, no.2222 (Jul 1966): 10–27.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-3441.1966.tb00666.xGian S. Sahota An Analysis of Technological Change in the United States Sulfur Industry, 1936–1960, The American Economist 9, no.11 (Jun 1965): 5–25.https://doi.org/10.1177/056943456500900101