Abstract
Social mobility, defined as vertical movement of positional status for members in a society, has profound effects on social stability, dynamics, and evolution. In this chapter, we compared as case studies of intragenerational mobility in adult females of Tibetan (Macaca thibetana) and Japanese macaques (M. fuscata) to illustrate how social mobility can be measured in primate societies and how group size affects social mobility. Using dominance rank data (absolute ranks) collected from two long-term field projects in Mt. Huangshan, China, and on Koshima Island, Japan, we found that group size was over three times larger in Japanese macaques than in Tibetan macaques. The former also showed a higher level in the rate of rank change than the latter. Interestingly, due mainly to larger variation in the rate of rank change in Japanese macaques, social mobility measured by regression analysis showed no difference between the two species. However, when we used relative rank by factoring in group size, social mobility increased in Tibetan macaques but decreased in Japanese macaques when compared with absolute rank, leading to the counterintuitive result that social mobility was lower in Japanese macaques than in Tibetan macaques. Our results provide novel and unexpected insights into questions about social dynamics such as why group fission is so much more common than group fusion in primate societies.
Highlights
Social mobility refers to vertical movement of positional status of members in a society
Before we present our results, we briefly review some key issues related to the study of social mobility
An extremely unequal society with little mobility is evolutionarily unstable (Sun 2013). It tends to periodically experience major disruptions in the form of rebellion and revolution in humans (Bai and Jia 2016). It is in this sense that a certain level of mobility is essential for long-term social stability (Sun et al 2017)
Summary
Social mobility refers to vertical movement of positional status of members in a society In human societies, it refers to a wide range of upward or downward change in metrics such as income, social stature, education, and others that show some level of stratification (Lipset and Bendix 1992). Because status change tends to accumulate over time, intragenerational mobility is often measured per time unit, such as a month, a year, or a decade, to be comparable across studies. It is more accurately known as the rate of social mobility (Clark 2014). Before we present our results, we briefly review some key issues related to the study of social mobility
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
