Abstract
Abstract This is a study about the size effect on the methodology with concrete cylinder specimens for analysis of the debonding phenomenon at the interface between concrete and carbon fiber reinforced polymer (FRP). The influence of the concrete specimen size variation is analyzed by maintaining the same geometry in adhered FRP. Direct tensile experiments were performed with three dimensions of cylindrical concrete specimens (diameter × height) for analysis of size effect: 50 mm × 100 mm, 100 mm × 200 mm, and 150 mm × 300 mm. Ten different geometries of the composite material were tested. Two failure modes were observed in the experiments: debonding between the two materials and tensile failure in concrete specimens. In experiments with interface failure, the size of concrete specimens has no significant influence on maximum force, shear stress to peak, and stiffness in debonding between concrete and FRP. However, the use of smaller specimens for analysis of interface collapse is limited because the concrete reaches its normal stress capacity with a lower tensile force, and therefore, the failure often occurs in the concrete.
Highlights
Fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) is one of the most modern materials for strengthening reinforced concrete structures
Two failure modes were observed in the experiments: failure in concrete specimens and debonding in the interface between FRP and concrete
In experiments with debonding failure, the size of concrete specimens has no significant influence on maximum force (Pmax), shear stress to the peak, and stiffness in debonding between concrete and FRP
Summary
Fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) is one of the most modern materials for strengthening reinforced concrete structures. FRP application can be made in two ways: it is externally bonded reinforcement (EBR) on structural elements or, it is. A great progress occurred in FRP research and studies for structural strengthening of reinforced concrete structures [1], [2] in the last decades. FRP is used for strengthening of metallic structures [4]–[7], masonry [4], [6], [8], [9], and wood structures [6], [10], [11]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.