Abstract

The end-systolic stress/volume ratio is currently recognized as a relatively load-independent index of myocardial contractile performance, but its dependence on ventricular size may limit its value for interpatient comparisons. In this study, the relation between the end-systolic stress/volume ratio and left ventricular end-diastolic volume was anglegraphically analyzed in 104 patients with normal coronary angiograms. Eighteen patients had a normal ventricle, 24 had aortic stenosis, 18 had aortic regurgitation, 9 had mitral regurgitation and 35 had cardiomyopathy.An inverse relation between the end-systolic stress/ volume ratio and left ventricular end-diastolic volume was demonstrated in the normal group (r = 0.72, p < 0.001); subjects with a larger left ventricle had a reduced index but, presumably, the same degree of contractility as that of subjects with a smaller ventricle. Attempts to normalize values by using end-diastolic volume or body surface area were unsuccessful. A similar inverse relation was demonstrated in the aortic stenosis group (r = 0.48, p < 0.05), probably because hypertrophy helps to keep wall stress normal or low despite progressive ventricular enlargement in these patients. The end-systolic stress/volume ratio was also inversely related to left ventricular chamber size in patients with volume overload due to aortic regurgitation (r = 0.80, p < 0.001) and in those with cardiomyopathy (r = 0.84, p < 0.001). However, at a given left ventricular end-diastolic volume, the end-systolic stress/volume ratio was higher in patients with aortic regurgitation than in those with cardiomyopathy, suggesting better contractile performance for a comparable degree of ventricular dilation. Finally, patients with aortic stenosis and cardiomyopathy with comparable end-diastolic volumes had similar end-systolic ratios.These data provide evidence that the end-systolic stress/ volume ratio is highly dependent on the size of the left ventricular chamber in humans and that this dependence differs according to the nature of the underlying myocardial disease.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call