Size and location of lightning-induced ionisation enhancements from measurement of VLF phase and amplitude perturbations on multiple antennas

Abstract

A 600-km array of five Trimpi receivers (“elements”) has been set up in New Zealand broadside to the VLF (22.3 kHz) transmitter, NWC, some 6000 km west, with element separations varying from 8 km to 550 km. Although such a five-element array is inadequate for imaging of lightning-induced ionisation enhancements (LIEs) by VLF holography, or inverse scattering, estimates of LIE size and location can be made if the shape and form of the LIE can be guessed or assumed, with even fewer elements. With five elements, tests of the assumed model can be made as well. Owing to its transform properties, the simplest model to use for scattering inversion is the Gaussian LIE distribution. For this model, and for single mode propagation, an inversion process is derived here for the full range of LIE and path dimensions, ranging from those for which the receiver is in the diffraction far field to those in which “geometric optics” dominate. This inversion process has some validity for small LIEs of other shapes of simple form. For more extreme models, the dominance of geometry or diffraction can usually be established in individual cases which then allows simple scaling procedures to be used in scattering inversion. Some 70 Trimpi events were observed on all five elements during a single night in July. 1991 (late winter). These were used to determine LIE location and size, and to test the applicability of various LIE models. It was found that most LIEs that night occurred over the Tasman Sea near the great circle from the VLF transmitter, NWC, to Wellington, generally some 500 to 2000 km from Wellington, and with north-south dimensions of 100–250 km. Much longer east-west dimensions (oriented towards NWC) are suggested to account for the very strong Trimpis observed. While about half of these LIEs that night could have had a smooth lateral spread (e.g., Gaussian), the remainder required varying degrees of fine structure, from “flat” or Butterworth LIEs to multiple LIEs as might be expected from multiduct whistlers, to explain the observed diffraction pattern exhibiting maxima and minima as well as the wide angular range over which simultaneous Trimpis were observed.